Blocklist

Sort:
Avatar of CrusaderKing1
Problem5826 wrote:
blackfirestorm wrote:

I’ve actually got 8 pages of blocked people but I know that a bunch are no longer on the site so I could probably remove them 

 

You are a middle aged female.

The lad is a teenaged male.

Do you really think that he should be even remotely on your mindset or wavelength?

This is something like me thinking that I should naturally be on the same wavelenth as my 8 year old girl cousins.

Blocking and reporting is safe-space nonsense.

Hilariously accurate post, definitely had a good chuckle.

Avatar of blackfirestorm
Problem5826 wrote:
blackfirestorm wrote:

I’ve actually got 8 pages of blocked people but I know that a bunch are no longer on the site so I could probably remove them 

 

You are a middle aged female.

The lad is a teenaged male.

Do you really think that he should be even remotely on your mindset or wavelength?

This is something like me thinking that I should naturally be on the same wavelenth as my 8 year old girl cousins.

Blocking and reporting is safe-space nonsense.

Well I don’t care what you think is nonsense. I’ve been here 13 years and that 8 pages is built up over that time. On top of that I don’t care what age a person is if they’re sending inappropriate messages with dubious pictures of themselves ….. they get blocked 

Avatar of Problem5826
blackfirestorm wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:
blackfirestorm wrote:

I’ve actually got 8 pages of blocked people but I know that a bunch are no longer on the site so I could probably remove them 

 

You are a middle aged female.

The lad is a teenaged male.

Do you really think that he should be even remotely on your mindset or wavelength?

This is something like me thinking that I should naturally be on the same wavelenth as my 8 year old girl cousins.

Blocking and reporting is safe-space nonsense.

Well I don’t care what you think is nonsense. I’ve been here 13 years and that 8 pages is built up over that time. On top of that I don’t care what age a person is if they’re sending inappropriate messages with dubious pictures of themselves ….. they get blocked 

 

And I quite clearly couldn't care less for how long you've "been here". As if that means anything.

I also don't care if you don't care.

Deal with what I'm saying or be offski.

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

   Well, your a barrel of fun.....BLOCKED!angry.png

Avatar of blackfirestorm
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   Well, your a barrel of fun.....BLOCKED!

Ditto 😁

Avatar of Problem5826

LMAO

Avatar of Problem5826

Given that Corbyn (an old-aged hippy) was considered far less relatable than an Eton and Oxford graduated posh boy (Johnson) in this country, then I should think it's quite clear what people think lol

Whatever you think in your safe space with your blocking of anyone who points out extremely basic life out to you is your business.

Still the question of how a teenaged boy sees it like a middle aged woman, evidently nonsensical (unmarried and plenty of cats, I shall guess) remains.

Avatar of blackfirestorm
Problem5826 wrote:

Whatever you think in your safe space with your blocking of anyone who points out extremely basic life out to you is your business.

Still the question of how a teenaged boy sees it like a middle aged woman, evidently nonsensical (unmarried and plenty of cats, I shall guess) remains.

How is it basic when people on the anonymous internet behave like rabid dogs on heat? Surely your points should be aimed at them and their hormones in their pants?

Avatar of Problem5826

I'm not a dumbarse, male-feminist, white-knight, simp, virgin.

Deal with what I'm saying, please.

Avatar of blackfirestorm
Problem5826 wrote:

I'm not a dumbarse, male-feminist, white-knight, simp, virgin.

Deal with what I'm saying, please.

I know what you’re saying but as a bloke - I’m assuming you are - you wouldn’t have any clue as to what females on this site have to put up with!  

Avatar of Problem5826
blackfirestorm wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

I'm not a dumbarse, male-feminist, white-knight, simp, virgin.

Deal with what I'm saying, please.

I know what you’re saying but as a bloke - I’m assuming you are - you wouldn’t have any clue as to what females on this site have to put up with!  

 

I probably understand more than you will know.

You haven't dealt with what I'm saying.

I think you are in it for victim points. That's my take.

Which is the weakest form of status based on people who can't achieve literally anything. Seriously incapable of doing so in most cases.

My grandmother couldn't read or write. My mum didn't go to school until she was 10. Knew so much poverty that she thought the British "winter of discontent" was just another day.

I'm unamused. Lets put it that way.

Avatar of blackfirestorm
Problem5826 wrote:
blackfirestorm wrote:

I’ve actually got 8 pages of blocked people but I know that a bunch are no longer on the site so I could probably remove them 

 

You are a middle aged female.

The lad is a teenaged male.

Do you really think that he should be even remotely on your mindset or wavelength?

This is something like me thinking that I should naturally be on the same wavelenth as my 8 year old girl cousins.

Blocking and reporting is safe-space nonsense.

Ok lets go back to your post … 

I am not suggesting that the OP is on my wavelength nor am I suggesting I’m on his but fact is he created this thread to discuss why people are blocked. Him and others have explained as have I. Your only point in this thread is that you think we’re all small minded enough to think that we should all get over ourselves and stop blocking.

THAT is my point. If there weren’t as many idiots on this site then clearly we wouldn’t need to block in the first place. 

Avatar of Problem5826

I'm saying that the victimhood/oppression stuff is not in the least bit interesting to someone like me.

Please address what I said in my original post, since you've gone on like you have.

Avatar of Problem5826

Progress.

I'm being heavily monitored now and posts taken out for no reason with the red-banner.

If it's a discussion about blocking, why did Pete get blocked for putting the entire premise of the topic into question with absolute ease?

Avatar of blackfirestorm
Problem5826 wrote:

I'm saying that the victimhood/oppression stuff is not in the least bit interesting to someone like me.

Please address what I said in my original post, since you've gone on like you have.

I promise you I’m far from playing the victim card as it’s not pretty so finally we agree on something. 

Avatar of blackfirestorm
Problem5826 wrote:

Progress.

I'm being heavily monitored now and posts taken out for no reason with the red-banner.

If it's a discussion about blocking, why did Pete get blocked for putting the entire premise of the topic into question with absolute ease?

You mean about posts not following the sites TOS? Yeah that’s annoying. It’s the auto bot that is doing that.

Who is Pete?

Avatar of Problem5826
blackfirestorm wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Progress.

I'm being heavily monitored now and posts taken out for no reason with the red-banner.

If it's a discussion about blocking, why did Pete get blocked for putting the entire premise of the topic into question with absolute ease?

You mean about posts not following the sites TOS? Yeah that’s annoying. It’s the auto bot that is doing that.

Who is Pete?

 

Some guy who got blocked, by a lad who seemingly looks like he is bragging about blocking people on the internet.

Could have been an interesting discussing on the nature of blocking more generally, I think. With a fellow who would offer the counterargument at length.

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
Problem5826 wrote:
blackfirestorm wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Progress.

I'm being heavily monitored now and posts taken out for no reason with the red-banner.

If it's a discussion about blocking, why did Pete get blocked for putting the entire premise of the topic into question with absolute ease?

You mean about posts not following the sites TOS? Yeah that’s annoying. It’s the auto bot that is doing that.

Who is Pete?

 

Some guy who got blocked, by a lad who seemingly looks like he is bragging about blocking people on the internet.

Could have been an interesting discussing on the nature of blocking more generally, I think. With a fellow who would offer the counterargument at length.

Username please

Avatar of StumpyBlitzer

TOS Broken please no political posts and let's enjoy the forums. 

Avatar of Problem5826
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:
blackfirestorm wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Progress.

I'm being heavily monitored now and posts taken out for no reason with the red-banner.

If it's a discussion about blocking, why did Pete get blocked for putting the entire premise of the topic into question with absolute ease?

You mean about posts not following the sites TOS? Yeah that’s annoying. It’s the auto bot that is doing that.

Who is Pete?

 

Some guy who got blocked, by a lad who seemingly looks like he is bragging about blocking people on the internet.

Could have been an interesting discussing on the nature of blocking more generally, I think. With a fellow who would offer the counterargument at length.

Username please

 

Come on now. Go back in your own topic. You've literally made a point of discussing who you've blocked and why.

Guy's name is Peet something or other.

This forum topic has been locked