Yeah ,just letting it run wild and kill many people and smash health services sounds like a really good idea..dunnit
There are many things that kill many more people than corona do you want everyone to sit in their home everyone would go bankrupt and the world wouldnt work anymore then you have problems.
You seem to be missing the point that the only reason there's "only" 88,000 deaths reported thus far is because of the measures being taken. So, in your scenario, lift all measures and let 8 billion people get it, 9% of those over age 65, with about 10% of those dying...gee, that's only up to 72 million people...WW2 casualty numbers. I didn't even add in the numbers for under 65...another 14.4 million people at 0.2%. This also assumes we have enough ventilators and supplies to handle 86.4 million people just as well as they are being treated now, otherwise the death rate skyrockets.
No disease in the world gets to everyone that logic doesnt hold up For example my mother just had the flu for two weaks went visiting her everyday didnt got the flu myself will be with covid for many and if u read my reaction i said distance and protect elderly so you can scratch those 72 million and if u give rules to 0.2 percent like social distancing mouth masks maybe more rules you will end up with an even lower number and your economy will be intact or do you wanna count how many peoples lives will be worse if the economy plummets like this and there are other side effects like a lot of countries free inmates witch is also a danger to society.Besides we cant sit in our homes forever everyone would die because the world wouldnt work anymore.
Yeah ,just letting it run wild and kill many people and smash health services sounds like a really good idea..dunnit
There are many things that kill many more people than corona do you want everyone to sit in their home everyone would go bankrupt and the world wouldnt work anymore then you have problems.
You seem to be missing the point that the only reason there's "only" 88,000 deaths reported thus far is because of the measures being taken. So, in your scenario, lift all measures and let 8 billion people get it, 9% of those over age 65, with about 10% of those dying...gee, that's only up to 72 million people...WW2 casualty numbers. I didn't even add in the numbers for under 65...another 14.4 million people at 0.2%. This also assumes we have enough ventilators and supplies to handle hundreds of millions of people just as well as they are being treated now, otherwise the death rate skyrockets.
You still have internet service, so...I assume you are still eating, as well
.