Exactly, another reason you shouldn’t be forced to.
Ermm, no...this is a reason why you should not be overly concerned about long term effects unless there's some specific reason to be worried. The peanut butter you eat with trans fats also has long term side effects, but you eat it anyway . It's actually not that easy to make a compound that will do long term serious harm to the human body without showing any detectable indications along the way...
Could anybody hope to convey a realistic answer about any Covid subject to anyone who reacts to 'vaccinations work' with 'that's subjective' ... ?
Fortunately - there are lots of people potentially reading this forum.
So I would say - that when people talk about vaccinations and other measures working - and the massive lopsided statistics and many other indications showing that measures against Covid work -
that such talk might be communicative to all of those who are not reacting with 'that's subjective'.
But to those who are so reacting - any chance of communication with them would be slim or none. Except in cases where they openly withdraw from such positions - and concede that vaccinations work and that there is much objective evidence of same.
There's something called 'solipsism'.
It refers to a behaviour whereby nothing can be proven to an individual. In some cases not even by himself to himself.
He or she often only will concede that his/her mind exists.
But solipsism doesn't appear to be a pathological condition.
It is more like a strategy or tactical thing.
Something that is chosen.
Its employed temporarily.
Daring anybody to prove anything to him - knowing that he can and will reject all proof or logic.
It could be considered briefly - as a kind of 'attention' - the massive implications of the 'that's subjective' reaction.
It could begin to mean that such persons doubt the work of Louis Pasteur.
That they don't understand that vaccines have been around for a long time.
They want to believe that vaccines are 'fake'?
There are those who even believe that 'viruses can't spread diseases'.
But rather than try to talk to such persons - it could and would be more useful to discuss their behaviour.
And who they are.
Regarding the world leaders of the Covid disinformation campaign ...
If Joseph Mercola was here right now in this forum and anybody tried to talk to him or reason with him that 'vaccinations work' - would he or she 'get anywhere' with Mercola ?
I would say No. I would say that whoever would waste effort.
But that wouldn't mean we couldn't talk about Mercola and his behaviours right out in front of him.
In theory - if Mercola type behaviour didn't exist - and 'that's subjective' policy and so on - then Covid would have been beaten a long time ago. The pandemic might have died out sometime last year.
Possibility: That the pandemic has endured strictly because of the behaviour of people undermining the fight against it - or being passive to that fight.