I don't misread anything. it is why I am a former nuke team leader. you generate whatever narrative that feels good in your head. having to win a debate at any cost. cherry pick nonsense, write narratives, clearly doesn't understand regression line objective analysis. we don't intersect because nonsense doesn't interest logic often. exhausting time wasting leftist. no perspective, low IQ observation bias cherry picking nonsense
Covid-19 Discussion (moderated)
Sort:
regression line analysis, two opposite sloping lines intersect. it is you that can't post an objective debate, so you just write another nonsense narrative, ignorantly projecting your state, and too stupid to realize
bootlicker can't live by the same standard sets for others. please, block time waster
Kingsgam wrote:
I don't misread anything. it is why I am a former nuke team leader. you generate whatever narrative that feels good in your head. having to win a debate at any cost. cherry pick nonsense, write narratives, clearly doesn't understand regression line objective analysis. we don't intersect because nonsense doesn't interest logic often. exhausting time wasting leftist. no perspective, low IQ observation bias cherry picking nonsense
You still have not produced a single thing of value. Show your economist chops and let's see an actual analysis instead of manic bipolar ravings. Some punctuation and complete sentences would also be helpful. Argue an actual point.
Kingsgam wrote:
bootlicker can't live by the same standard sets for others. please, block time waster
Sigh. Okay.
Time waster blocked 
...have a nice day.
You know how PatriotGames and others said that the virus seems to affect the elderly more than the young.?....nursing homes. I heard a medical report that says if you have the dementia gene.....than you're more susceptible to getting the virus because that's where the virus seems to attach itself....I mean besides the lungs...the dementia gene. 
That may explain the high number in nursing homes. The're not getting the virus because the're old......the're getting it because a lot of residents in nursing homes also have stages of dementia. That would make sense. Young people don't get dementia.....well except for a few people on Chess.com....myself included.
That would also explain how some old people have survived the virus.....they don't have the dementia gene.
May 26, 2020
0
#1068
Wolfbird a écrit :
From the looks of things over the Memorial Day weekend, a good portion of the population is in denial about this pandemic.
In the usa 55% want the lock down to be removed.
May 26, 2020
0
#1069
Kingsgam a écrit :
you must set the two costs against each other poor economy = deaths this is due to a variety of things. food starvation, poor healthcare, suicides, murders for profit, etc pardon, but to say deaths don't occur due to a poor economy is rather uninformed Not: Debunked
Do you know how many trillions the us government gave to save a lot of jobs?
May 26, 2020
0
#1070
Kingsgam a écrit :
dammit Jim, I'm an economist works the other way around for a Dr CDC =/= Economist poor economy = deaths zoom focus distorts the field, basic principle you can't beat the basic laws of economics, no matter how much you focus on Dr have you seen the price of healthcare? not economists
Go back in march and remove all the lock down.
You think the economy will stay at 100%?
You don't think the death will not be x5?
How about having not 100 overwhelmed hospitals for 2 months but 500 for 6 months?
May 26, 2020
0
#1071
Toire a écrit :
It is fairly certain that there have been deaths directly and indirectly caused by the lockdown, but in the absence of any numbers, the quantity is unknown. The consensus at this point seems to be that the lockdown, in general, saved lives.
History may well have a better appreciation of the true position.
The lock down saved 100 k of life around the world.
If we had the lock down 1 month earlier we will not have 100 000 death in the usa right now.
The peoples infected came ALL from Asia and Europe!
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-asks-whether-taking-insulin-014739904.html
Please do not take insulin if you are not diabetic, and definitely do not take it any attempt to treat Covid-19...
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Toire a écrit :
It is fairly certain that there have been deaths directly and indirectly caused by the lockdown, but in the absence of any numbers, the quantity is unknown. The consensus at this point seems to be that the lockdown, in general, saved lives.
History may well have a better appreciation of the true position.
The lock down saved millions of life around the world.
If we had the lock down 1 month earlier we will not have 100 000 death in the usa right now.
The peoples infected came ALL from Asia and Europe!
Even though you missed my point completely, I'd normally ask for evidence of such extreme numbers you've posted...but I won't as I don't want the normal YouTube video spamming you propagate.
May 27, 2020
0
#1074
Toire a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Toire a écrit :
It is fairly certain that there have been deaths directly and indirectly caused by the lockdown, but in the absence of any numbers, the quantity is unknown. The consensus at this point seems to be that the lockdown, in general, saved lives.
History may well have a better appreciation of the true position.
The lock down saved millions of life around the world.
If we had the lock down 1 month earlier we will not have 100 000 death in the usa right now.
The peoples infected came ALL from Asia and Europe!
Even though you missed my point completely, I'd normally ask for evidence of such extreme numbers you've posted...but I won't as I don't want the normal YouTube video spamming you propagate.
It's better to have a lot of videos with info than 1 post from you in a month that say nothing new!
It's ironic that you complaint about me spamming videos when for a rare time i didn't not post one but i did give you in three short phrases the conclusion of all the videos i saw in the last few weeks.
May 27, 2020
0
#1075
Toire a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Toire a écrit :
It is fairly certain that there have been deaths directly and indirectly caused by the lockdown, but in the absence of any numbers, the quantity is unknown. The consensus at this point seems to be that the lockdown, in general, saved lives.
History may well have a better appreciation of the true position.
The lock down saved millions of life around the world.
If we had the lock down 1 month earlier we will not have 100 000 death in the usa right now.
The peoples infected came ALL from Asia and Europe!
Even though you missed my point completely, I'd normally ask for evidence of such extreme numbers you've posted...but I won't as I don't want the normal YouTube video spamming you propagate.
Lockdown Delays Cost at Least 36,000 Lives, Data Show
https://www.nytimes.com/subscription?campaignId=7FUK9
May 27, 2020
0
#1076
Toire a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
Toire a écrit :
It is fairly certain that there have been deaths directly and indirectly caused by the lockdown, but in the absence of any numbers, the quantity is unknown. The consensus at this point seems to be that the lockdown, in general, saved lives.
History may well have a better appreciation of the true position.
The lock down saved millions of life around the world.
If we had the lock down 1 month earlier we will not have 100 000 death in the usa right now.
The peoples infected came ALL from Asia and Europe!
Even though you missed my point completely, I'd normally ask for evidence of such extreme numbers you've posted...but I won't as I don't want the normal YouTube video spamming you propagate.
A study has estimated there may have been 36,000 fewer coronavirus-related deaths had the US entered lockdown a week earlier in March.
The Columbia University research also estimated that around 83% of deaths could have been avoided if measures had been taken two weeks earlier.
It suggested that 54,000 fewer people would have died had cities begun locking down on 1 March.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52757150
I was actually alluding to the less discussed issue of the number of deaths caused by lock-downs, (currently an unknown quantity), but thanks anyway.
Whatever the number of deaths caused directly or indirectly by lockdowns it is insignificant
in the scheme of things. NZ and Australia have outstanding records fighting the virus.
May 27, 2020
0
#1079
ATV-STEVE wrote:
Whatever the number of deaths caused directly or indirectly by lockdowns it is insignificant
in the scheme of things. NZ and Australia have outstanding records fighting the virus.
It helps that we're island nations and can therefore have pretty strong border controls, but more importantly our leaders have listened to the medical experts and taken their advice.
Australia's had just over 100 COVID related deaths - per capita, that's equivalent to 13,000 deaths in the US. The number there of more than 100,000 would be the equivalent of 7,000 here, and I just find that number staggering.
where did you say deaths due to a poor economy? quote it let's see your model for the 64K deaths, produce it you seem to have a personality disorder, narcissism rather low IQ
If you can't post a single argument in support of your assertions beyond "drones", "low IQ", "economist and nuke team leader", etc. then you're going to end up blocked. Say something cogent and reasonable, or you'll be taking your posts elsewhere
.