Denial of Truth 2
Sort:
Cubronzo_old
Jun 17, 2017
0
#1
The particulars of your sediment are flawed with inconsistencies and atrocities of another world. I don't think you could understand where I'm coming from, logic you see is a social construct. I think you like to feel the self as an expression of the holy one, but Einstein was wrong all along. Order is just a delusion.
Cubronzo wrote:
You again
This is a response to ChumpDavis123
Cubronzo wrote:
You're right, I don't understand where you're coming from
The particulars of your sediment are flawed with inconsistencies and atrocities of another world. I don't think you could understand where I'm coming from, logic you see is a social construct. I think you like to feel the self as an expression of the holy one, but Einstein was wrong all along. Order is just a delusion.
Jun 17, 2017
0
#5
ChumpDavis123 wrote:
You floop, you maNgy rat!!! You don't understand because you are not open minded because you are too logicL.
Cubronzo wrote:
You're right, I don't understand where you're coming from
The particulars of your sediment are flawed with inconsistencies and atrocities of another world. I don't think you could understand where I'm coming from, logic you see is a social construct. I think you like to feel the self as an expression of the holy one, but Einstein was wrong all along. Order is just a delusion.
Cubronzo has a superiority complex
Maybe you see reality as a delusion, but that's probably because you're trapped in your own bubble of chaos. At least try to make sense of the world before dismissing the very potential of thought, since thinking is a process involving constraint for a selective dynamic, which is exactly what you're doing when you're trying to deny the existence of such possibilities as you write.
Cubronzo. Is the title talking about you?
'constraint for a selective dynamic,' eh? What does that mean?
DavidPeters2 wrote:
Figure it out Pete
'constraint for a selective dynamic,' eh? What does that mean?
This thread is weak. We need a more prominent argument.
Cubronzo wrote:
The particulars of your sediment are flawed with inconsistencies and atrocities of another world. I don't think you could understand where I'm coming from, logic you see is a social construct. I think you like to feel the self as an expression of the holy one, but Einstein was wrong all along. Order is just a delusion.
Sediment makes some beautiful rocks. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, but there's nothing wrong with using positive sediment to make them.
Societal representations of invariable concepts are useful. Trying to deny the concept can serve no purpose other than to destroy all historical and future achievement.
The word "two" may be changed, but the concept of having 2 of something remains invariable. Likewise, the way a society represents order may differ, but the existence and concept of order are invariable, and no idea or feeble attempt at defiance can change that, so this entire debate is pointless for both advocate and prosecutor, as nothing anyone says makes any difference.