TRY to be more precise and objective. A good start would be to actually take note of what Scarani says, for example after 32:18 in the video where Scarani says that he "obviously" does not want to save determinism! Clear enough?
If you prefer a printed source, in Scarani's own authoritative words, "Bell nonlocality is not merely an instrument for a negative task (falsifying determinism)". If it needs emphasising, this means he takes it for granted that Bell nonlocality falsifies determinism (with its usual meaning in our Universe, of course) and goes on to more interesting consequences.
At the very end someone is asking about how gravity doesn't come from where a planet was, but where it is? What is this? I haven't heard of this infinite speed of gravity thing.
There's quite an art in taking nonsense that someone says, twisting into into something sensible and responding as such. I should acquire it sometime.
Firstly, I recall saying "very unwise".
It is not wrong in the same sense that it is not wrong to hypothesise that invisible fairies move all the particles in the Universe, perfectly emulating the results that are predicted using the laws of physics, including QM and GR.
I leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine how wise it would be to believe that hypothesis.
lol. and i’ll leave you and your knockout thread (as in business jargon) in peace.. for now