Does True Randomness Actually Exist?

So your explanation for the appearance of the Sun and the Moon is that YOU HAVEN'T GOT A CLUE WHERE THEY ARE, BUT MAYBE SOME LOCATION EXPLAINS THEIR APPEARANCE?

How air-headed a position is that?

By contrast, the real explanation works. You don't have the capability to check this, but plenty of other people do.

He's trolling. This will run and run if you let it.

Opt - Elroch and I have corresponded for many years

You know we were all shown a toy globe in Kindergarten and told that is where we live.

Never......................... Ever.................................... To Question It!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To be fair, that doesn't change anything except maybe you've desensitised him.

I have indeed tried to reason with noodles for years, but he dodges all precise discussion to psychologically protect a daft set of beliefs.

See the above regarding the location of the Sun and the Moon as an example. He sees no problem with thinking he can work out what the Moon would look like while using no reasoning and not having any idea where it is.

It is a fact that heliocentric theory was NOT derived via observations. Copernicus and others were sun worshippers and freemasons. That ought to tell any thinking individual something about how the theory was derived, 

One does not observe stars light years away. They imagine them to be.

One does not observe a sun 93 million miles away and 100's of times larger than the moon. They imagine it to be.

One does not observe a rotating moon in perfect sync with a rotating earth so one side of the moon is only visible forevermore. They imagine it to be.

etc.   etc.  etc. 

One can reason however they choose. That does not negate these facts. 

@Elroch
I could never work out why people, including yourself, thought they could maybe get tygxc to think straight. Though I don't think it was deliberate, on his part, unlike this.

Human intelligence is based on human imagination. I've seen that with my bare eyes.

After all, ALL your own comments are coming straight out of your imagination but you aren't trying to filter them to get rid of ideas that aren't based on reality. In that respect, your end product is worse than the ones you criticise, even though there are going to be important ideas mixed in, but lost amidst all the trippy stuff.

NAH its just some HECKITTY groovy toony tom foovery crap..AHAA

Trippy stuff indeed 

There is a significant similarity.

Key aspects are entirely unsound reasoning, being unaffected by any discussion of the reasoning, and obsessive repetition of false mantras.

Here is an animated gif whose frames are simply photos of the Moon. The effect of the non-circular orbit is clear.

I will be amused to hear a flat Earther explanation of these direct observations!

There are far too many contradictions within heliocentric theories for it to be believable. Most people believe it because they were told to believe it and never questioning it for their entire lives.......for it was never meant to be questioned.......just believed. 

That is why there is a toy globe in every classroom, store, theater etc. etc. etc. 

We are bombarded with the ball everywhere we look 

OMG man its just prejection byt aliens it not tgha truth you beliuve what those isiot guys say??dude th earth is srsly flat and you know what the whole solar system is flat! and if you just knew the tryuth and feel like jumping off a cliff just dont forghet that he cliff is also flat..Just dont belive uin this BALL theory ahaa actually all the balls are flat too yk

The theory of Gravity just like heliocentric theory have NEVER been proven. 

They are merely accepted theories that have been shoved down our throats since birth.

they say u cant prove s/t is random...tho u can quantify it. i kinda gettit...kinda.

but then if u cant prove it ?...how do u know its there ? see ?...lol !