Does True Randomness Actually Exist? ( ^&*#^%$&#% )

to check equal counts, try replacing the ‘ands’ with chained ‘==’ like this..

if loopy["Snake Eye"] == loopy["2"] == loopy["3"] == loopy["4"] == loopy["5"] == loopy["6"]:

..also instead of jumping to 12B i’d start with just 6 or a dozen rolls and build your way up cause it should become very rare very quick

lemme build in a tracer to find out at what count the (6) numbers WERE equal. seems to reason that the higher the sample count the lower the prob to parity. not sure.

so...i did it. this is my result (for 12MM rolls):

****

10307262
6578 All the Same

Counter({'6': 2002514, '3': 2002176, '4': 1999478, 'Snake Eye': 1999106, '2': 1998641, '5': 1998085})
10.49 seconds

****

...with the random sample #10,307,262 being the very last RNG'ed that found parity. dividing this by (6) ?...we get 1,717,877 for each of the (6) numbers after such try.

if loopy["Snake Eye"] == loopy["2"] == loopy["3"] == loopy["4"] == loopy["5"] == loopy["6"]:

[...] it should become very rare very quick

SOOO TRUE !! ...TY hiho ! ...i feel its ~65/1 to get the combination (not permutation) 1,2,3,4,5,6 in any order in the first (6) rolls. iows, "6/6 x 5/6 x 4/6 x 3/6 x 2/6 x 1/6" i tink

plz check my math ?...thx ! L♥

1 in 65 sounds about right.

i bleeve its (d!)/((d/6)!)^6 // 6^d = [wanted outcomes // possible outcomes] = odds of getting 123456 or 11,22,33,44,55,66 or 111,222,333,444,555,666 etc.

with: d = # of dice

so if (6) dice ? ...then 6!/1 // 6^6 = ~1/65

or if (12) dice ? ...then 12!/2^6 // 6^12 = ~1/291

...and on & on & on we roll .

so if u do 12MM rolls tryn4parity ?... im getting that the odds are converging towards some kinda eulers # thingy...e^(-1))*100 or ~1 in 37. so in one a those rolls ? ...u will make parity one time every 37 tries in at least one roll. with the very last roll being 12MM dice lol ! (uhhh were gonna need a bigger dicebox shaker)

lol. a bigger dicebox and a whole lot of patience, literally more than the age of the universe..

if my combinatorics (binomial coefficient) arithmetic (i.e. using my toes lol !) serves me (as it s/t's doesnt) for the very last 12MM'th roll I get:

12,000,000!/2,000,000!(^6) // 6^12,000,000 = odds to get exactly 2MM 1's, 2MM 2's, 2MM 3"s, etc.

WAY too big/way too big // also way too big

...owell ::/ (im wearing my glasses)

más o menos 4.37x10⁻¹⁸ or say 1 in 2.29x10¹⁷

i oopsied...its wasnt 2,000,000^6 (upper demoninator) its 2,000,000 !(^6)

not really sure which big # calculator ur using ?...but wow !!

Maybe there is only 1 timeline

And no randomness

i sooo hope not. only cuz that makes me feel guilty a my dumdum choices...

what do you mean? like super determinism? that’s sabine’s flavor of choice..

https://youtu.be/HLclvXEJypY?t=1545

Maybe there is no deyerminism for us, but somehow everything is predicted or run by alien supercomputers. Idk, who knows.

i think what you’re saying is that despite the randomness we observe, the universe might be deterministic. If that’s what you meant, it’s absolutely a valid view.

although.. aren’t you a bit young to think about things like this?

“True-randomness is the type of randomness that is not produced by a deterministic process.”

So only if quantum superposition is actually real