TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 11, 2019

0

#21

RonaldJosephCote wrote:

"Lol Elroch? That you??" Yeah...the OP makes a lot of strange comments. You'd think that after a yr and a half the OP could go to my homepage and see that it looks nothing like Elroch's homepage......so who knows.

Lmao! as if I haven't. lol so funny 😂

I as well said that if you were not him, then you were not him..

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 11, 2019

0

#22

jazzman625 wrote:

TheBestBeer_Root wrote:

You don’t have to like my thread but just forewarned you easily can be stopped to post too.

Please do me a favour and block me from posting here . I understand the truth must be painful for you to hear but the scientific consensus is clear. Experts have looked at every possible explanation for the observed warming and come to the conclusion that co2 is the culprit.

You may say you don't believe the scientists but every single day of your life you are relying on scientific knowledge and technology. Including of course, every time you play chess over the internet.

I suspect that I will not convince anyone to change their mind and you won't change mine either so this is all a bit pointless.

I will therefore leave you with this.

If, in the future, my side of the argument is proven to be incorrect then some countries will have wasted money developing and installing renewable energy. Not completely wasted mind you because the renewables will have provided energy without adding other pollution (for example small particulates that contribute to lung diseases and breathing problems) to the atmosphere. In addition their economies might have taken a hit by not digging up and selling the fossil fuels.

Now lets think about the consequences if your side of the argument is wrong.

There will be floods in some areas. Droughts in others. Wildfires, storm surges, hurricanes and tropical diseases will increase in number and geographical scope. People will die. Possibly millions of people will have migrate away from badly affected areas. The cost to economies will be huge. Wildfires alone for example can be a very expensive business.

You may think I'm being 'alarmist'. Well, the really alarming thing is that small increases is temperature (caused by man made co2 emissions) could nudge the planet to warm itself up through feedback mechanisms such as snow and ice melting (releasing methane into the atmosphere - also a greenhouse gas) or wildfires. Once the cycle gets going we won't be able to stop it.

So to summarise - if my side of the argument is wrong we incur some financial losses. If your side is wrong well - the planet will be fine. Humans - not so much.

Anyway I shall leave you to your conspiracy theories and wish you a nice life. I just hope your grandchildren (and mine) will get to live as good a life that you and I have.

Goodbye

Just a thought..... You think these higher elite ones with crooked agendas to depopulate not have intelligence to claim what you're addressing, as to be so, when it isn't, but easily could be accepted real? I will look into more of that linked article I posted in chats to you, and thank you your contributed posts, no disrespect.

shadowcat53

Dec 17, 2019

0

#23

Of course you would stop him , because truth is your enemy , and lies your trusted companion.

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 17, 2019

0

#24

Truth ‘is never’ the enemy. Even the thought of not having the truth of something is because OF an enemy to begin with. Had there never been a rebellion that word wouldn’t even had been created, invented, nor needed. Shadowcat53

DavidNorman435

Dec 18, 2019

0

#25

Listen, global warming was only suggested by a politician!! Not a scientist (that's ipse dixit btw), and during the Jurassic period, the world was actually about 20x hotter than it is now.

shadowcat53

Dec 18, 2019

0

#26

The science is clear and the truth shall set you free.

odisea777

Dec 18, 2019

0

#27

Denialists: can you be specific about which scientists have rejected human causes of global warming? One post above says "many, many true scientists." can you be specific so I can research that? I'm willing to investigate all viewpoints.

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 18, 2019

0

#28

shadowcat53 wrote:

The science is clear and the truth shall set you free.

Truth certainly shall.

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 18, 2019

0

#29

ab121705 wrote:

Denialists: can you be specific about which scientists have rejected human causes of global warming? One post above says "many, many true scientists." can you be specific so I can research that? I'm willing to investigate all viewpoints.

Perhaps you be more specific which post you saw it say ‘many many true scientists’?

What post # is that?

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 18, 2019

0

#30

It is also very easy for the higherarchy elites to pay off particular scientists to build their claim as to global warming by some claimed logical falsity that they themselves completely know.

Thank you DavidNorman435 for your contributed post and everyone else.

odisea777

Dec 18, 2019

0

#31

TheBestBeer_Root wrote:

ab121705 wrote:

Denialists: can you be specific about which scientists have rejected human causes of global warming? One post above says "many, many true scientists." can you be specific so I can research that? I'm willing to investigate all viewpoints.

Perhaps you be more specific which post you saw it say ‘many many true scientists’?

What post # is that?

sorry, post #6

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 18, 2019

0

#32

Thank you for that, but it’s actually post #4, now viewing what you were meaning.
I had pasted his whole post from another thread that is this one now that I reopened and was enlarging because I was wishing his post to be recognized, and I do thank you letting me know.

And I don’t know if you do any research with this, if this helps but he as well left this in his post that I hadn’t added with my post#6.

If you are interested, Michael Savage goes in-depth about the government and global warming in his book Government Zero.

RonaldJosephCote

Dec 19, 2019

0

#33

Michael Savage is a conspiracy theorist......not a scientist. He has 50 books.....the're all anti-government.

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 19, 2019

0

#34

Lol GOOD . 🤣

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 19, 2019

0

#35

Some of that article, as well one comment from;

Evidence Proves That CO2 Is Not A Greenhouse Gas

TheBestBeer_Root · 2019-12-06T23:08:51-08:00

I was blocked by him but here’s my rebuttal. Climate scientists criticize government paper that erases ‘pause’ in warming By Maxim Lott Published June 10, 2015 Until last week, government data on climate change indicated that the Earth has warmed over the last century, but that the warming slowe

“The CO2 error is the root of the biggest scam in the history of the world, and has already bilked nations and citizens out of trillions of dollars, while greatly enriching the perpetrators. In the end, their goal is global Technocracy (aka Sustainable Development), which grabs and sequesters all the resources of the world into a collective trust to be managed by them.” ⁃ TN Editor

Much discussion took place over the following years between colleagues, with one of the main points being the similar effect of water vapour in the atmosphere which was part of the total figure. Some rejected any effect of CO2 at all. There was no effective way to determine this split precisely, but in 1906 Arrhenius amended his view of how increased carbon dioxide would affect climate.

The issue of Arrhenius mistaking a water vapor effect for a CO2 effect is not new. What is new is that the growing level of empirical evidence that the warming effect of CO2, known as climate sensitivity, is zero. This means Arrhenius colleagues who “rejected any effect of CO2 at all” are correct. In short, CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.

Joseph A Olson

September 18, 2018 at 12:45 am | #

There is NO greenhouse gas and NO phantom back radiation warming force.

Read the full Tyndall report at Geologist-1011 website and the footnotes on Tyndall errors by Timothy Casey.

Svante Arrhenius was proven wrong by Knut Angstrom in 1896 for not excluding water vapor, reran his experiment, proven wrong again. US Monthly Weather Report, June 1901 acknowledged that the whole world knew Arrhenius was wrong. In 1906, the Rockefeller puppet Samuel Langley admitted error in IR measurements, which forced Arrhenius to admit he was wrong.

Alarmists will soon admit they were ONE GIANT HOAX.

MainframeSupertasker

Dec 19, 2019

0

#36

This greenhouse hoax is all over my geography textbooks. I used to believe in this lie for years and that made me feel "warmer" every year. Now that someone exposed the lie, I became skeptical and checked myself again. I believed it, and that made me feel warmer. Now I dont believe in it anymore. Makes me feel safe and secure btw I felt no increase in heat when I debunked the assumption.

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 20, 2019

0

#37

You keep it directed in God’s Hands, MainFrame, and it will continue to be only it’s proper harmoniousness, His governed Truth, regardless what A N Y of the ones based worldly accept.

If only everyone TRULY KNEW God there would never be plane crashes, because each on that plane would know The True Pilot, and such GOVERNMENT would manifest BY trusting The Lord, He BEING The Pilot. In Him we live and move and have our being.

shadowcat53

Dec 20, 2019

0

#38

"And He took a child and set Him in the midst of them :...I believe that would be Greta Thunberg. ..a very brave child..

TheBestBeer_Root

Dec 20, 2019

0

#39

That ‘crisis’ is their agenda to startle and gain full control of the population to fear their “AGENDA”.

The crazy fires and all the hurricanes, THAT THEY e a s i l y can direct ELSEWHERE as well DIMINISH ENTIRELY with their corrupt capabilities has been going on for many decades, and you can research!

ANOK1

Dec 21, 2019

0

#40

aww this is so cute , it reminds me so much of the look my dog gives me when i come in to find the bin bag shredded on the floor , that , it wasnt me it was a burglar look ,

fess up to what youve done humanity youve banjaxxed the climate and you know it , so enough of the denying it you are bang to rights

Evidence Proves That CO2 Is Not A Greenhouse Gas

Joseph A Olson