Erik caught lying? Exposed?

Sort:
Avatar of PhD_in_everything

I had caught @erik lying red-handed. In his profile he says...

I am the guy who put Chess.com together - who came up with the site vision, put together an amazing team (Jay, Piotr, Igor, and others), and then worked day and night to design the site and get it going. I have 3 beautiful daughters, one wild son, and a wonderful wife! I learned chess when I was 8 years old, but didn't really pick it back up until about 15 years ago. Since then I have been playing, studying, and enjoying it regularly. I prefer semi-open and closed positions that blow up tactically (like the Closed Sicilian, King's Indian, Glek etc). I'm also "chesscom" on reddit.

So he plays the closed Closed Sicilian. But wait, in the "Chess.com Founders Explore World Chess Logo" video at 2:04 you can hear Erik say, "I'm going to play the closed, I've never played the closed before." This doesn't add up. He says he plays the closed but he hasn't played the closed?? Erik what is happening? 

Link to the article: https://www.chess.com/news/view/chess-com-founders-explore-world-chess-logo-2688

Link to the video (lol it got age restricted): https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=127&v=MIwF6Hs02JQ

Avatar of IMKeto

Avatar of Bilbo21

I'd always had my suspicions about him.

Avatar of riagan

The power we are dealing with is immeasurable.

Avatar of PhD_in_everything
greekgift_221b wrote:

Btw he is the only one who likes laok, therefore he is laok.

Stamina liked LAOK. Why? Because they had a common enemy; LilBoat21.

Avatar of Me_Named_Wert
Dramatic music plays
Avatar of The-Artful-Podger

you didn't know he has a PhD in practical joking ? something is lacking in your arsenal dude.

Avatar of PhD_in_everything

I have a PhD in criminology. I'm used to interrogations and catching liars.

Avatar of The-Artful-Podger

in your dreams ?

Avatar of PhD_in_everything
David-Carotene wrote:

in your dreams ?

I have already achieved my dream.

Avatar of josephyossi
ulfhednar1234 wrote:
riagan wrote:

The power we are dealing with is immeasurable.

hey law and order

Yep, welcome back @LawandOrderking

Avatar of erik

Avatar of The-Artful-Podger
PhD_in_everything wrote:
David-Carotene wrote:

in your dreams ?

I have already achieved my dream.

i doubt you will wake up.

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

 null

Avatar of PhD_in_everything
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

 

I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

  Well your not too smart carrying on a conversation in the SPAM thread.

Avatar of PhD_in_everything
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

  Well your not too smart carrying on a conversation in the SPAM thread.

What are you? A wannabe moderator? This is real mature and nice of you.

null

 

 

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

EXACTLY.  You asked in the SPAM thread, why it gets periodically replaced.  There are specific instructions posted about the SPAM thread. After those instructions we're pointed out to you,  you CONTINUED to converse in that thread. I sent you 2 PM's instructing you not to converse in the SPAM thread. You pretended to be stupid, but clearly you're STUPIDER than that. Get a PHD in common sense. I SUGGEST STAFF CHECK YOUR IP ADDRESS.

Avatar of walidmujahid
erik wrote:
 I  wish sarcasm was available as a font.

Already taken care of :-D https://thenextweb.com/dd/2011/12/12/finally-sarcasm-has-a-voice-in-print-with-its-own-font/

Avatar of PhD_in_everything
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

EXACTLY.  (1) You asked in the SPAM thread, why it gets periodically replaced.  (2) There are specific instructions posted about the SPAM thread. (3) After those instructions we're pointed out to you,  you CONTINUED to converse in that thread. (4) I sent you 2 PM's instructing you not to converse in the SPAM thread. (5) You pretended to be stupid, but clearly you're STUPIDER than that. Get a PHD in common sense. I SUGGEST STAFF CHECK YOUR IP ADDRESS.

1. I did, I didn't read the fine print. There was really no need for fine print, the OP could have easily just written it normally.

2. No there weren't.

3. Again, no they weren't.

4. Are you sure what you said was appropriate?

5. What you said was just out of the blue.