RedgirlZ

Sort:
Avatar of IsraeliGal
MelvinGarvey wrote:

@Soniathingie

Plus, hey, look at you: you're talking as if:

1°) Your opinion is everybody's opinion.

2°) This would be your place.

Lol.

Ur talking as if anyone here actually wants ur opinion.

 

 

Avatar of IsraeliGal
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:

Yeah, here is it: "Who are you?" followed by "Nobody cares" poses the question: "But how come you asked then?"

If someone got roasted...

Exactly. She posed a question, and I simply responded to it. I thought about pointing it out, but didn't cause I expected another seemingly inarticulate response.

U talk about inarticulate responses but i've never seen u post something on these forums that requires more than 2 brain cells rubbing together.

ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. 

 

Avatar of Abhinav
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

U talk about inarticulate responses but i've never seen u post something on these forums that requires more than 2 brain cells rubbing together.

ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. 

 

Prove that, your last sentence -"ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. "

I never make unnecessary/random threads or spam. I try to help people whenever I can.

So on the contrary, that line's more applicable to you, if anything.

Avatar of IsraeliGal
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

U talk about inarticulate responses but i've never seen u post something on these forums that requires more than 2 brain cells rubbing together.

ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. 

 

Prove that, your last sentence -"ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. "

I never make unnecessary/random threads or spam. I try to help people whenever I can.

So on the contrary, that line's more applicable to you, if anything.

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

 

 

Avatar of IsraeliGal
MelvinGarvey wrote:

It turned out such a fashion, some years ago, maybe more than a decade ago actually, to have some posters in forums, acting as if what ever they say is godly truth, and whatever others say can be nothing but utter garbage, just based on some assumed popularity (and age) of one and the other.

Obviously, some posters of that time, forgot to grow up with time and years passing, and don't even realize they are not 13 years old anymore... Would I be Sonia, I'd feel so very lonely and isolated right now. Where are your "many" supporters Sonia? You're alone.

that's not my stance, when i see a post or see someone say something i dont know I learn, and appreciate good content. 

The problem is ur just sitting here making potshots, there's nothing for me to appreciate. 

If u post something interesting or informative i'll give u ur brownie points

 

Avatar of Abhinav
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

--- SNIP Again ---

Prove that, your last sentence -"ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. "

I never make unnecessary/random threads or spam. I try to help people whenever I can.

So on the contrary, that line's more applicable to you, if anything.

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

 

 

You were the first one here to claim that I am a person that's here to garner attention by any means necessary. The onus currently lies on you to prove that first, and only after when you have done that, I will offer you an explanation for the claims made by me.

Avatar of IsraeliGal
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

--- SNIP Again ---

Prove that, your last sentence -"ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. "

I never make unnecessary/random threads or spam. I try to help people whenever I can.

So on the contrary, that line's more applicable to you, if anything.

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

 

 

You were the first one here to claim that I am a person that's here to garner attention by any means necessary. The onus currently lies on you to prove that first, and only after when you have done that, I will offer you an explanation for the claims made by me.

Yeah, the problem is, i dont need ur explanation, cuz ur wrong, bye now.

 

Avatar of IsraeliGal
MelvinGarvey wrote:

But hey, Sonia, you do rarely, if ever, post anything usefull and actually informative, you know, you don't care about others enough so you'd have any motivation for such things. Most my posting is intended to bring a smile on some faces, and I'm sure I fail often. Other times, I do help newcomers, but I'm sure you never read these threads.

Anyway, good for you if you improve and gain any maturity. We all need it (to do the same).

I've helped plenty of people that have had problems with the site or needed advice, if ur gonna start trying to claim back it up. 

I care about people who are genuine, But feel free to continue pandering and making "useful" content like this: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/vote-best-fake-mustache

 

Avatar of Vibhansh_Alok
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

--- SNIP Again ---

Prove that, your last sentence -"ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. "

I never make unnecessary/random threads or spam. I try to help people whenever I can.

So on the contrary, that line's more applicable to you, if anything.

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

 

 

You were the first one here to claim that I am a person that's here to garner attention by any means necessary. The onus currently lies on you to prove that first, and only after when you have done that, I will offer you an explanation for the claims made by me.

Leave it...

Avatar of Woollensock2
I will always side with Sonia, in any augment against her . She been unfairly treated by many members on this site ,and especially by member @Itude who’s nasty rhetoric against her still continues .
Avatar of Abhinav
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

--- SNIP Again ---

--- Snipping yet again ---

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

You were the first one here to claim that I am a person that's here to garner attention by any means necessary. The onus currently lies on you to prove that first, and only after when you have done that, I will offer you an explanation for the claims made by me.

Yeah, the problem is, i dont need ur explanation, cuz ur wrong, bye now.

 

In your last reply, you literally wrote- "so explain how it's more applicable to me" (sic) , and now you write - " i dont need ur explanation, cuz ur wrong" (sic). Maybe first decide if you really want an explanation or not? Why ask for an explanation only to reply later that you don't need it in the first place?

This is exactly like the "no one cares' thing you did in the beginning. Kindly don't do it all over again. And goodbye to you as well. Have a good day. happy.png

Avatar of IsraeliGal
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

--- SNIP Again ---

--- Snipping yet again ---

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

You were the first one here to claim that I am a person that's here to garner attention by any means necessary. The onus currently lies on you to prove that first, and only after when you have done that, I will offer you an explanation for the claims made by me.

Yeah, the problem is, i dont need ur explanation, cuz ur wrong, bye now.

 

In your last reply, you literally wrote- "so explain how it's more applicable to me" (sic) , and now you write - " i dont need ur explanation, cuz ur wrong" (sic). Maybe first decide if you really want an explanation or not? Why ask for an explanation only to reply later that you don't need it in the first place?

This is exactly like the "no one cares' thing you did in the beginning. Kindly don't do it all over again. And goodbye to you as well. Have a good day.

I wanted to see what ur reasoning was, cuz i've literally only got 1 post on this account. 

I wanted to see how u were gonna try and defend ur claim, but u cant, because ur wrong, as per usual.

 

Avatar of IsraeliGal
Vibhansh_Alok wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Abhinav0121 wrote:
MelvinGarvey wrote:
 

--- SNIP ---

--- SNIP Again ---

Prove that, your last sentence -"ur just another person thats here to garner attention by any means necessary. "

I never make unnecessary/random threads or spam. I try to help people whenever I can.

So on the contrary, that line's more applicable to you, if anything.

I've never made unnecessary random threads or spammed either, so explain how it's more applicable to me. 

 

 

You were the first one here to claim that I am a person that's here to garner attention by any means necessary. The onus currently lies on you to prove that first, and only after when you have done that, I will offer you an explanation for the claims made by me.

Leave it...

 

U wouldn't know what fool was if it hit u in the face.

 

Avatar of Abhinav
Soniasthetics wrote:

I wanted to see what ur reasoning was, cuz i've literally only got 1 post on this account. 

I wanted to see how u were gonna try and defend ur claim, but u cant, because ur wrong, as per usual.

 

You're talking about post count as if no one knows what your previous account was. 😐

And again, the proof of burden currently lies on YOU, not ME. You first prove your absurd claims against me, and I will proceed to prove my claims. I am not even defending them right now. You are again trying to duck (sorry Cryysis) the whole thing.

Avatar of IsraeliGal
Abhinav0121 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:

I wanted to see what ur reasoning was, cuz i've literally only got 1 post on this account. 

I wanted to see how u were gonna try and defend ur claim, but u cant, because ur wrong, as per usual.

 

You're talking about post count as if no one knows what your previous account was. 😐

And again, the proof of burden currently lies on YOU, not ME. You first prove your absurd claims against me, and I will proceed to prove my claims. I am not even defending them right now. You are again trying to duck (sorry Cryysis) the whole thing.

I didn't have many posts on my previous account either sherlock. 

 

Avatar of Woollensock2

Go get em Sonia ! 👍

Avatar of IsraeliGal
MelvinGarvey wrote:
Soniasthetics a écrit :

I care about people who are genuine, But feel free to continue pandering and making "useful" content like this: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/vote-best-fake-mustache

Sure, keep thinking and believing humorous threads are of no use at all, it does suits you to expose such a sad view of it: trying to make people laugh or smile is soooo useless Sonia. Proven thing. In your heart only.

Now, I've made pages long threads about strategy and all, for beginners. Lots of work, lots of details, lots of care.

All got deleted by cc abusive 1984 like system: if one is muted or banned, you shall also burn their house and destroy all their belongings, eradicate every single track of their existence.

I hope you can only understand, that I've had hundreds of pages of very informative and usefull content deleted for no good reason, just by the arbitrary, mechanized system cc chooses to use on users, for they do believe, what ever we post, can't be of any value at all, and they are the angry gods punishing and destroying around, cos they can.

And so, I'm now doing mostly light hearted posting, for the time I was throwing my goods into a bottomless pit is over, when I stated, no one raised any protest for the deleted content. (When I received lots of thanks and praises while it was still "alive").

You're just being pointlessly aggressive and disdainful toward others Sonia, and that's a nasty habit, I'm sure you wish you could amend. But I'm not sure you actually can.

How am i being nasty? cuz im not unreasonably nice to u? lol.

And if ur "useful" content then take it up with chess.com, their policy doesn't include deleting community friendly content.

 

Avatar of IsraeliGal
MelvinGarvey wrote:

All this reminds me of an old truth: we've got the forum we deserve. When people would massively protest against full and complete deletion of "informative and usefull" threads, then maybe things would be different.

But one can only state the general apathy, the carelessness about such things. There is no risk doing a big protest thread, but barely anyone cares for posting in it and feed it, and make cc reconsider their ways.

They rather post in thjreads complaining how toxic and poor the forum is. Go figure.

It's not complaining if it is a fact that the forums are toxic and full of immature children like urself.

 

Avatar of Woollensock2
Yeah ! .....goodbye at last 😤
Avatar of Woollensock2
Sonia those two are just a couple of nerds , leave them to wallow in their ridiculous self-esteem.
This forum topic has been locked