Ok, admittedly maybe more than once in a while.
What is wrong with Chess.com?
Sort:
Macer why are you friends with macer_75 ??
Seriously Macer75 are you from USA? or did the REAL macer outsource you along with this spam?
Because, like I said in my Official Statement thread, I'm more amused than bothered by the 2 fake macers. Plus, macer_75 is by far the nicer of the 2.
You don't need to pay and still get all the benefits on here. Why does macer75 sound like Czar or Ritual?
Here's a link to my Official Statement thread, with answers to all other macers-related questions. Although I have a feeling that most people asking those questions have already seen the thread...
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/official-statement-from-macer75-regarding-macer-75-macer-75-etc
Sometimes its not about you Macer75. Maybe its about the sudden Monopoly of our spam. It used to be well mixed with abject crap from the USERS!
NOW its over run with useful and affordable black magic!
I have a serious question, does anyone know why sometimes when I try to get to 'daily puzzle' I just keep getting 'missing page' ? Like today 
It workd for me Idk
May 26, 2014
0
#51
mamushka hat geschrieben:
I have a serious question, does anyone know why sometimes when I try to get to 'daily puzzle' I just keep getting 'missing page' ? Like today
Some technical glitch. I got that too today. Just come back to it later. Normally it works just fine.
so it is pretty obvious that no serious chess player wants to bother with a distracting SEND function, in particular not in rapid play. In contrast, a very natural feature is lacking: a move list, such that you (immediately after the game) can go to e.g., move 30 from 70 in one go, without having to press 80 times 'back'. I am talking about the iphone app here, obviously.
The lack of entirely natural features and the presence of useless features suggest that the developers aren't chess players.
NimzoDave wrote:
so it is pretty obvious that no serious chess player wants to bother with a distracting SEND function, in particular not in rapid play.
It is both pretty obvious that 1-you don't read the comments and 2-you don't play rapid chess here. The send button is here only in correspondance games.
Hell, I never even noticed a "send" button, where is it so I can begin to be bothered by it?
jkurucar wrote:
In short, I spoke up because I think both sides are wrong. Yes, non-paying members should be able to contribute to the community. But no, OP is dead wrong based on the evidence provided.
Hear, hear !
May 27, 2014
0
#58
NimzoDave wrote:
so it is pretty obvious that no serious chess player wants to bother with a distracting SEND function . . .
blah . . . blah . . . blah . . .
The lack of entirely natural features and the presence of useless features suggest that the developers aren't chess players.
Based on the responses in this thread, the conclusion you state isn't at all obvious. The only thing obvious is your arrogance.
Maybe that's because the real macer is a grown-up who likes to have a bit of childish fun once in a while?