Oh. You mean what if there was not the invention of money to begin with?
You judge the idea by its fruits.
You have an idea about how long a day is. Can you go without a watch? How can you know you're doing things in time? Where's uniformity? Kids come to school at random times during the day. Men come to work at random times. Conferences are shortened. You come to home late after work and get your wife worrying at home. But now, let's introduce a standard, which is uniform, and by which everyone understands and follows, the Clock. All problems solved.
Let's go without money, assumed that we started without the invention of money. Statistically, you will see some people at the far end of the scale suffering, because they "spent too much energy". Remember, you need to work to help yourself and help others. Dont be lazy.
Now lets say for example, the entire African population overworked and now they seeked help from each other. Poor people give help&service to poor people? It's like asking another patient to care for you when you are sick. You'll be suffering for a day, but the lucky countries come to help you within a day. You still suffered. You got helped. The same thing happens to another continent, then they get helped.
Now lets introduce money and updating systems of suffering and welfare schemes. Problems solved. This way you can know what populations are overbenefiting and oversuffering and equilize them in time before they suffer.
You cannot take away the unit of time, you just need to take care whether you are using time the right way. You cannot take away the unit of value, you just need to take care whether you are using money the right way.
ask and receive
...would be because having no money as a societal need would manifest such success indeed.