GUNS

locked up behind bars only needs such needed actions 

a good guy with phone could do the same.

i mean if there are no guns then just call the police.

I havent watched the videos though.

ExploringWA I don't even think that it's worth discussing it with ole Mug. wannabeGM may be more reasonable, but I don't know.

umm, the kid chose to put himself in that situation. 

no. you keep projecting your ignorance. that someone might not be aware of the difference between a 9mm and a .25 is 180° from knowledge about gun violence.

did i mention politics? no. 

the child put himself in that place! your comparison of a phone to a gun is as strawman. 

Fire first - waste him.

The best defense is a good offense.

I meant if there are no guns then calling the Police would do the trick. And if there is a gun then u couldnt defend urself, not even with a gun because if u try to pull ur gun he shoots u.

So im thinking making it hard to get a gun prevents this more than equiping everyone with a gun cause the gun doesnt even help u.

I mean i respect the idea and going from allowing guns to not allowing guns is probably not a good thing cause there would still be way too many guns around and thouse without probably relly would be screwed, but in germany for example i never hear anything about gun shootings while in america it happens like regularly i heard and thats just cause in germany its so hard to get a gun that a gun wouldnt be used for just shootings or minor criminal acts and i think that is just the best way to prevent bad guys with guns.

while i can see that america shouldnt change its laws i still wish that gun would have never been allowed like in the USA, just because as i said making it hard to get a gun is the better option in my opinion.

….clearly shows your ignorance regarding violence 

lmao that’s like saying money was a good idea

….and yet thousands right now somewhere are leaping into dumpsters to eat something left over from some family’s garbage.

@ExploringWA 

I posted this in my one thread about what would you do to change the world….

That perception is only based because you being so shackled to exactly what I wish removed from your perception, your understanding, your acceptance, your belief standards.

I am saying had there never been it’s development the nature of civilization in whole would drastically change and that advancement so awesome easily able to remove such a conception as your statement regarding human nature being terrible.

No, you didn’t say that, but this response from me on that thread to a post fits my response here.

….my point is had there to begin with been no system such as need OF $ there’d never had been any need for helping anyone.

This is more from my thread, a poster and my response.

MainframeSupertasker 
Jan 7, 2020#62
Oh. You mean what if there was not the invention of money to begin with?

You judge the idea by its fruits.

You have an idea about how long a day is. Can you go without a watch? How can you know you're doing things in time? Where's uniformity? Kids come to school at random times during the day. Men come to work at random times. Conferences are shortened. You come to home late after work and get your wife worrying at home. But now, let's introduce a standard, which is uniform, and by which everyone understands and follows, the Clock. All problems solved.

Let's go without money, assumed that we started without the invention of money. Statistically, you will see some people at the far end of the scale suffering, because they "spent too much energy". Remember, you need to work to help yourself and help others. Dont be lazy.

Now lets say for example, the entire African population overworked and now they seeked help from each other. Poor people give help&service to poor people? It's like asking another patient to care for you when you are sick. You'll be suffering for a day, but the lucky countries come to help you within a day. You still suffered. You got helped. The same thing happens to another continent, then they get helped. 

Now lets introduce money and updating systems of suffering and welfare schemes. Problems solved. This way you can know what populations are overbenefiting and oversuffering and equilize them in time before they suffer.

You cannot take away the unit of time, you just need to take care whether you are using time the right way. You cannot take away the unit of value, you just need to take care whether you are using money the right way.
MainframeSupertasker 
Jan 7, 2020#63
Therefore you need a UNIT which is uniform, universally accepted and comprehensible.
TheBestBeer_Root 
 

#64
Bro bro bro bro bro...... Given there never was money, and not given I just was able to change the world from it’s removal, no one would worry as what you just described. With everyone working for each other, and since the time of money’s history, so many things on Earth would not even had been thought of, such as war, nor racism, nor homelessness because everyone would not be needing anything they weren’t able to receive because of such it’s development working for each other, war never would have been a debate because no one would be seeking control from another nor the ignorance of the harm war completely causes, it’s after affects throughout the life cycle, and racism wouldn’t be some pathetic development because ALL WOULD RECOGNIZE THE FAMILY WE TRULY ARE . Such WOULD be seen ENTIRELY.

Weapons do not make mankind evil. We need weapons because mankind is evil. Weapons are necessary because we do not live in a perfect world. They are a necessary part of our existence, to maintain the security of the law abiding.

I’m stating my concern regarding $, if it had never been a system we never would’ve had the absurd violence nor need whatsoever of weapons.

Mankind invented weapons to defend themselves against mankind O-o

ignorant, true

Notice the ridiculous siloette in black on both sides gun handles… gasping absurdities lmao