Again, AL, I’m not talking about what led to the situation or any political or personal beliefs. I’m only commenting regarding the self defense aspects of the shootings. You keep wanting to make this about anti gun politics.
The crowd was armed. A violent repeat felon with an illegal handgun tried to kill an innocent teenager who was legally armed with a rifle the law said he was entitled to carry.
From a purely technical self defense perspective, the gun Kyle chose to legally carry was utilized to fend off a crowd of armed violent felons. It clearly shows the self defense ability of a motivated person who is armed. Politics aside.
you have an, umm, interesting view of self-defense. you choose to ignore that the kid travelled to wisconsin. he then receives a gun-as a minor-and goes to the middle of a riot.
you want to make it sound as if he was at home, reading a book (wait, can he even read?) and an intruder busts down the door and comes after him with a machete.
i didn't follow the case closely, but, didn't he say he went there to protect property? how does that work walking down the middle of the street?
that people in the crowd had past convictions is irrelevant. this type of lame reasoning is regularly used to assign blame or guilt today due to past actions.
ignorant, true
yep.