Laughing your ass off again ?
Ok, you have no facts, we get that.
If the universe requires a creator then the creator should require a creator = religion is made-up
Sort:
alex-rodriguez wrote:
"Can you show us what you mean by "Evolution is based on fact", dprsholder, instead of just saying 'its a fact so i'm an idiot'."
You're not an idiot (as far as I know). You just need to educate yourself. Google evidence evolution, read the 364,000,000 results, then get back to us. With some hard work you will eventually be able to figure out evolution is the strongest fact of science, and the foundation of biology. I have read 5 books about how evolution works and the overwhelming evidence for it, not to mention countless science websites.
Do your own homework. Nobody is going to hold your hand. If you're too lazy to study science, nobody cares. Nobody is going to be your free science teacher, especially since your kind are a total waste of time. Trying to explain science to a science denier is equal to trying to explain science to a dog.
Are you calling me a science denier ?
with absolutely no information on my level of education ?
You consider yourself an enlightened being ?
You are unable to support your "facts".
All you do is childishly rant against people.
Your pet theory is like a baby's soother for you.
You have no credibility.
You shout "evolution for the win" and its not even the topic.
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Laughing your ass off again ?
Ok, you have no facts, we get that.
Rahhh! dp wants a cracker!
Rahhh! dp wants a cracker!
( watch,watch,watch....ask him another question!)I think its evolved!
iluvzmetuna wrote:
drpsholder wrote:
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Can you show us what you mean by "Evolution is based on fact", dprsholder, instead of just saying "its a fact so i'm an idiot".
Sure, but notice that I was only offering the same amount of evidence as the person I was responding to.
If he gets to say that its not a fact and offers no evidence of those facts being wrong...........then I can claim it is a fact and offer not facts too.
the floor is yours pal, give us all your facts and stop complaining about other people not delivering goods for you.
Stand up and be a man.
Now, that's hilarious. I point out that I ONLY responded in a way that was posted to me.
So to summarize:
Person A makes a claim based on no evidence. Person B responds to person A in the exact same manner to show person A that they have no offered no evidence for their claim. Person B knows that as soon as person A asks for evidence...........person B has set up person A to look stupid, since person A didn't provide any evidence of their claim, but yet think that person B needs to provide evidence for his claim.
LOL
But besides all the entertainment..........we would need to figure out IF you are able to understand the facts that support evolution, because what would be the point in showing them to you, if you are not going to be able to understand them?
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Laughing your ass off again ?
Ok, you have no facts, we get that.
WHAHAA! So its quite obvious with your statements that you realize person A should have offered evidence for their claim, since you are wanting me to provide evidence of my claim.
But you didn't ask person A for their evidence, only person B. Hmmmmmm, interesting, huh?
thanks for proving my point! LMAO!
chessterd5 wrote:
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Laughing your ass off again ?
Ok, you have no facts, we get that.
Rahhh! dp wants a cracker!
Rahhh! dp wants a cracker!
( watch,watch,watch....ask him another question!)I think its evolved!
Polly? Is that you?
Sep 12, 2015
0
#1148
I'm an athiest but its just plain to see that the vast majority of people feel the need to believe in some sort of god. As long as they are tolerate of other people who have different beliefs i really don't see the harm in this. It helps people fear death less and gives them strength in times of grief and makes them believe that even if their life is not so great they will be rewarded in the after-life. Religion however has produced things such as the inquistion and the crusades. So in my view religion itself is harmless as long as it does not contain within it intolerance of other views.
If you're an atheist, does that mean you dont believe in an imaginary god or you dont believe an intelligence exists beyond atheism or you are certain there is no "God", whatever that may be ?
drpsholder wrote:
iluvzmetuna wrote:
drpsholder wrote:
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Can you show us what you mean by "Evolution is based on fact", dprsholder, instead of just saying "its a fact so i'm an idiot".
Sure, but notice that I was only offering the same amount of evidence as the person I was responding to.
If he gets to say that its not a fact and offers no evidence of those facts being wrong...........then I can claim it is a fact and offer not facts too.
the floor is yours pal, give us all your facts and stop complaining about other people not delivering goods for you.
Stand up and be a man.
Now, that's hilarious. I point out that I ONLY responded in a way that was posted to me.
So to summarize:
Person A makes a claim based on no evidence. Person B responds to person A in the exact same manner to show person A that they have no offered no evidence for their claim. Person B knows that as soon as person A asks for evidence...........person B has set up person A to look stupid, since person A didn't provide any evidence of their claim, but yet think that person B needs to provide evidence for his claim.
LOL
But besides all the entertainment..........we would need to figure out IF you are able to understand the facts that support evolution, because what would be the point in showing them to you, if you are not going to be able to understand them?
how to say nothing in 50 words or so.
You make a wonderful "science fiction" author.
no surprises on another BWHAHAHAHA post.
What you say is true because you say it and you go laughing your ass off if another uses your method.
sirrichardburton wrote:
I'm an athiest but its just plain to see that the vast majority of people feel the need to believe in some sort of god. As long as they are tolerate of other people who have different beliefs i really don't see the harm in this. It helps people fear death less and gives them strength in times of grief and makes them believe that even if their life is not so great they will be rewarded in the after-life. Religion however has produced things such as the inquistion and the crusades. So in my view religion itself is harmless as long as it does not contain within it intolerance of other views.
Sorry that you CANT understand despite trying very hard to do so! LOL
I wonder why that is the case? Dont WANT to or simply CANT?
Understand what ?
What are you stupidly accusing ?
Your response to that post is ridiculous!
You "evolution is all there is to life" fruitcakes should all be blocked from future threads like this because you systematically troll them with idiotic crap.
iluvzmetuna wrote:
If you're an atheist, does that mean you dont believe in an imaginary god or you dont believe an intelligence exists beyond atheism or you are certain there is no "God", whatever that may be ?
Theism........belief in god.
Atheism........lacks a belief in theism, lacks a belief in a god, but will generally admit that a god could possibily exist. Just like they will admit that unicorns may exist, but they just don't believe they do. Just like they will admit that bigfoot may exist, but they just don't believe he does.
Being "certain" incorporates "knowledge" into the idea of "belief", which are two different things.......since atheism/theism has to do with whether you believe in a god or not.
So being "certain" would make you gnostic, whereas being "uncertain" would make you agnostic.
I call myself agnostic atheist............I do not know if a god exists, but I do not believe a god exists.
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Understand what ?
What are you stupidly accusing ?
Your response to that post is ridiculous!
You "evolution is all there is to life" fruitcakes should all be blocked from future threads like this because you systematically troll them with idiotic crap.
See? LOL! I tell you that you can't understand and then response proves that you don't understand. LOL!!!!!
The question that remains is WHY? And this is the question that no one is willing to answer.
I was actually asking sirrichardburton. thanks anyway, but i know what its about. i just wanted to know if he has his own reasons or if he just goes with the herd.
What age are you dprsholder ?
and is "you cant understand" your only way to communicate with people even though they were not even explaining anything to you ?
Is there a reason you do not answer a single question put to you ?
Same as mr Stephenson and alex-rodriguez.
Just troll, troll, troll.
Just troll, troll, troll. "
WHAHAHAHAHAAH! So you are saying that "trolling" is bad?
Since Lola is doesnt answer questions..........and I decided to do the same to show those who do it that its not the best way to debate, suddenly you think that Im the one that started it???
Why have a problem with me, but not Lola...........especially when Im ONLY doing it because she is.
iluvzmetuna wrote:
What age are you dprsholder ?
and is "you cant understand" your only way to communicate with people even though they were not even explaining anything to you ?
Is there a reason you do not answer a single question put to you ?
Same as mr Stephenson and alex-rodriguez.
Just troll, troll, troll.
Because if I answer a question(like Im doing now, so hopefully this shows you that you are wrong), then how can I show Lola that her way of debating is not productive??
By employing her tactics, so that her discussion isn't productive???????
Or should I keep asking her questions(that clearly she's not going to respond to)?
which is a good way to show her that her way of debating is OH SOOOOOO BEIGE.........lackluster, boring, nonproductive, meh!
Tell me! I got to hear this one because even if you offer a different solution, it will be quite obvious to you that if you pick on me, then you are picking on Lola too..................since Im only doing what she does.
Interesting to say the least, huh? LOL
Ok, you're a copycat, drpsholder. Obviously a big fan of Lola. You are not doing a good job of it of course, you have no style and sound nothing like her.
Trolling is being disruptive ... ie you, Stevo and alex, because you have no respect for the topic.
Lola ... she's got legs! and class!
Yeah I know, but that's all the unspiritual guys have!
Evolution this, evolution that.
Is there a post where one of these geniuses points out how National Lampoons Evolution proves that if the universe needs a creator, then the creator needs a creator, or the big bang evolved from nothing and banged the universe into existence out of nothing for no particular reason. And that would not be a fairy tale because it is an observeable fact!
Should see some more cut and paste shortly.
Could not be said better Tuna........the cut & paste crowd don't have the intelligence nor creativity to think for themselves.
Says the people who CANT understand rudimentary logic or the simplest of facts.
They do this because it entertains the smart people and they just don't get it! WHAHAHAHA