You know that you can use the custom game thing chess.com have to make that you only play low rated player lol
ignore it

You know that you can use the custom game thing chess.com have to make that you only play low rated player lol
Nah, you can't specify like this. You can choose from 0 to -500 but you will always get paired with someone who is near to your rating

You know that you can use the custom game thing chess.com have to make that you only play low rated player lol
Nah, you can't specify like this. You can choose from 0 to -500 but you will always get paired with someone who is near to your rating
When I play causal bullet, i often times meet some 1300s with the custom game setting .-.

You know that you can use the custom game thing chess.com have to make that you only play low rated player lol
Nah, you can't specify like this. You can choose from 0 to -500 but you will always get paired with someone who is near to your rating
When I play causal bullet, i often times meet some 1300s with the custom game setting .-.
*If it is not rated, only then it happens because they have less player on that pool*

You know that you can use the custom game thing chess.com have to make that you only play low rated player lol
Nah, you can't specify like this. You can choose from 0 to -500 but you will always get paired with someone who is near to your rating
When I play causal bullet, i often times meet some 1300s with the custom game setting .-.
*If it is not rated, only then it happens because they have less player on that pool*
I forgot you had to play rated lol

Don't be that kind of person. Get 2k legitimately.
Nah, I will get it legitimately. I didn't farm it by playing a 10 year kid. Look at my game archive

Isn’t this cheating? The whole point of the seek settings is for it to be random. Yes, you can potentially get a 1600, but it is random. You can also get a 2000. By doing this, you’re basically guaranteeing a win, which is unfair.

Isn’t this cheating? The whole point of the seek settings is for it to be random. Yes, you can potentially get a 1600, but it is random. You can also get a 2000. By doing this, you’re basically guaranteeing a win, which is unfair.
Nah, it is not a granted win. I lost a lot to 1600s recently. It is not cheating because my opponent is not losing on purpose, we are playing chess and maybe I may even lose

But it is a fact that they are weaker than you, so you have drastically better chances of winning than if you just played normally.

honestly it feels better getting 2000 knowing you got it legitimately by beating a 2000 rather than "cheating" and beating a lower rated player

Still as you guy may think it is unfair, I decided not to play with 1600 before getting to 2000.
But you’re doing it now. Giving yourself a higher chance of winning is fundamentally unfair.
[]