What have you contributed to this conversation? If you complain about my.. I don't know what your even talking about, rather then fighting my arguments, I think it says quite a lot about you.
Is evolution true?
Sort:
#182
What have you contributed to this conversation? If you complain about my.. I don't know what your even talking about, rather then fighting my arguments, I think it says quite a lot about you.
What have you contributed to this conversation? If you complain about my.. I don't know what your even talking about, rather then fighting my arguments, I think it says quite a lot about you.
#198
Correct. If the changes were bad, the animals died quickly.
Correct. If the changes were bad, the animals died quickly.
#177
Okay you got me there lol.
Okay you got me there lol.
Here are the creationist achievements when science even haven't starting it's effort :
1.The atomic transmutation prediction.
2.The matter duplication practice.
3.The wormhole phenomena prediction.
4.Stem cell (Eve was created from Adam's ribs).
5.Implying evolution (Adam is a giant).
6.The nature laws could be change.
7.Speedy abiogenesis (Moses stave turn out to be living snake).
8.Faster than light speed.
9.Space and matter came from one substance.
Wait what Adam is a giant? Where does it say that?
VicountVonJames wrote:
Wait what Adam is a giant? Where does it say that?
In my religious text.
Feb 6, 2018
0
#208
Fifthelement wrote:
Here are the creationist achievements when science even haven't starting it's effort :
1.The atomic transmutation prediction.
2.The matter duplication practice.
3.The wormhole phenomena prediction.
4.Stem cell (Eve was created from Adam's ribs).
5.Implying evolution (Adam is a giant).
6.The nature laws could be change.
7.Speedy abiogenesis (Moses stave turn out to be living snake).
8.Faster than light speed.
9.Space and matter came from one substance.
Absolutely absurd and I hope this is trolling.
Feb 6, 2018
0
#209
Reasonable person: “When the bible says rib it means rib.“
Creationist: “When the bible says rib it means stem cell.”
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
Reasonable person: “When the bible says rib it means rib.“
Creationist: “When the bible says rib it means stem cell.”
You just imagine the text said stem cell and it would be uncomprehended.
Thus religious text is not a science purposed book.
Feb 6, 2018
0
#211
I’m just gonna take this as more trolling. Back to science... 🔬
Feb 6, 2018
0
#212
Stevie-Nikkers wrote:
some of these guys can only quote from books, like they were a BIBLE and give religious people the two finger salute. oooooooooh the irony.
Actually a book is too much work.
So most use websites nowadays. moat of which were created from old Creationists books, written 40 years ago or more.
Thats how these old, long refuted arguements manage to stay alive, long after serious Creationists have abandoned them. They look brand-new, on the website!!
Feb 6, 2018
0
#213
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
Reasonable person: “When the bible says rib it means rib.“
Creationist: “When the bible says rib it means stem cell.”
Creationist: "When the Bible says seven days, it means seven days."
Reasonable person: "When the Bible says seven days, it means 13 billion years."
Feb 6, 2018
0
#214
varelse1 wrote:
Stevie-Nikkers wrote:
some of these guys can only quote from books, like they were a BIBLE and give religious people the two finger salute. oooooooooh the irony.
Actually a book is too much work.
So most use websites nowadays. moat of which were created from old Creationists books, written 40 years ago or more.
Thats how these old, long refuted arguements manage to stay alive, long after serious Creationists have abandoned them. They look brand-new, on the website!!
you are right -- people don't take the trouble to get books
varelse1 wrote:
Stevie-Nikkers wrote:
some of these guys can only quote from books, like they were a BIBLE and give religious people the two finger salute. oooooooooh the irony.
Actually a book is too much work.
So most use websites nowadays. moat of which were created from old Creationists books, written 40 years ago or more.
Thats how these old, long refuted arguements manage to stay alive, long after serious Creationists have abandoned them. They look brand-new, on the website!!
I think all the possibilities of human issue have been covered in religious text.Something out of the book could be a digression.Thus it could destroy the humanity itself.
varelse1 wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
Reasonable person: “When the bible says rib it means rib.“
Creationist: “When the bible says rib it means stem cell.”
Creationist: "When the Bible says seven days, it means seven days."
Reasonable person: "When the Bible says seven days, it means 13 billion years."
There is refutation about fossill/geology dating according to religion.
Hihowrudoing wrote:
varelse1 wrote:
Stevie-Nikkers wrote:
some of these guys can only quote from books, like they were a BIBLE and give religious people the two finger salute. oooooooooh the irony.
Actually a book is too much work.
So most use websites nowadays. moat of which were created from old Creationists books, written 40 years ago or more.
Thats how these old, long refuted arguements manage to stay alive, long after serious Creationists have abandoned them. They look brand-new, on the website!!
you are right -- people don't take the trouble to get books
In fact,there are so many accurate predictions by religious text is impressive.
Feb 6, 2018
0
#218
Fifthelement wrote:
varelse1 wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
Reasonable person: “When the bible says rib it means rib.“
Creationist: “When the bible says rib it means stem cell.”
Creationist: "When the Bible says seven days, it means seven days."
Reasonable person: "When the Bible says seven days, it means 13 billion years."
There is refutation about fossill/geology dating according to religion.
There are many attempts to "discredit.".
I havent been presented with anything yet, that could be called "refutation."
And certainly, no evidence whatsoever, to support a 6000 year-old universe.
Are you glad to see me again?
By the way...........
The simplest protein is ribonuclease. It has many amino acids. And different kinds of amino acids. Amino acids can only operate correctly if it is arranged in just the right way. If it's just ONE amino acid off, it won't work properly. Remember that ribonuclease is THE SIMPLEST protein. So how could and explosion go off, and then make thousands of ribonuclease that are just right???
Also, explosions DESTROY things, not MAKE them.
The simplest protein is ribonuclease. It has many amino acids. And different kinds of amino acids. Amino acids can only operate correctly if it is arranged in just the right way. If it's just ONE amino acid off, it won't work properly. Remember that ribonuclease is THE SIMPLEST protein. So how could and explosion go off, and then make thousands of ribonuclease that are just right???
Also, explosions DESTROY things, not MAKE them.
I was asked "where did the micro organisms come from"
I replied "by that logic where did God come from?"
If we all used the "prove me wrong" idea then this would be a perfectly valid pro-evolution argument-
"Not all things can (or need to) be explained. Prove evolution doesn't exist"
If we both use these arguments then we will get no where.
Creationists routinely have very different standards of evidence to purportedly “prove“ their own position. All of the scientific evidence in the world for evolution are never enough. And despite the fact that their claims are far more incredible (an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent deity), the standards of evidence they require for their own position are minuscule. That’s called special pleading.