life
Not particularly inspiring - At least it would appear to be 'in sync' if you will, with today's headlines.. which also are not very inspiring - But, who would want to build a philosophy, along those lines!? - Well, obviously, some do.. And, I Don't doubt, that they regard their philosophical opposites, as equally Strange!
.. Such, is Life! -- And, another confirmation, that among Other things .. the 'Powers-that-Be' leave up, to each person to decide.. Is our constrained 'free will'.
- Not to bemoan that.. Since it Is, in one sense, the Greatest Mystery, to be solved! .. And, 'fwiw'.. I don't even think, that as long as we're reasonably 'civil' to one another.. That this 'Great mystery'.. and how we view it.. Is even 'grading' us, in a 'Pass-Fail context - It's Not! ..Hallejulah! [ :
No, it's not. But if you assume it's an illusion because somebody told you, then it's there. You still don't see it as an illusion, but as a possible illusion--not the same thing.
Therefore I see the illusion of choice before me, the option, but understand that really there is only way.
It's like this Troy. You see a beautiful rose. You understand that all there truly is is one energy but the beauty illusion remains.
You aren't free either. You are in the sense you understand the dream is only a dream but nonetheless you are still dreaming!
That's the point: as long as you exist, you will be dreaming. As long as you exist, it will always be about you--'reaching Everest', 'your problems', 'your choice', 'your observation'.
As long as you exist, the illusion is alive and kicking.
It's like this Troy. You see a beautiful rose. You understand that all there truly is is one energy but the beauty illusion remains.
You are mixing up 'beautiful' with'beauty'. You cannot see beauty(not a beautiful thing) as long as you exist. Not two ways about it.
Post #36 I can't relate to at all. Unless you mean experience can be beautiful. In itself. Is that how you are viewing things?
Post #36 I can't relate to at all. Unless you mean experience can be beautiful. In itself. Is that how you are viewing things?
We were talking about beauty. Not a beautiful thing, in itself or otherwise, but beauty apart from an object. That's it, beauty without object.
I think we both agree that truly there is no self.
I have to admit you're baffling me.
Sometimes you say something and I think yeah that's a great understanding.
Like when you say acceptance of the illusion isn't real. All there is is the illusion.
You're referring to something else now I can't relate to at all. At least not right now.
That's it, if it doesn't reflect reality it reflects a fantasy, a projection, an illusion.
There are no stages of seeing: one either sees or they don't; no in-betweens. No 'deeper' or 'less profound'. That is the relative dimension of the illusion.
The truth is absolute.
I think we both agree that truly there is no self.
I have to admit you're baffling me.
Sometimes you say something and I think yeah that's a great understanding.
Like when you say acceptance of the illusion isn't real. All there is is the illusion.
You're referring to something else now I can't relate to at all. At least not right now.
Here's why, it's rather simple: you cannot relate to anything without an object. That's because the subject creates the object; the subject being there, the object is there. Always a subject, always an object: that is the illusion!
When the subject is gone, the object is gone, and a perception without object is born: that is beauty.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I've found that all that's real is nature and that choice and beauty and righteousness are illusions. As is death actually.
Everything just is.