Read the entire thing again dum dum, I quoted sir McDonald Triumph's words and you're not intelligent enough to even search about that if I have provided quotation marks with it and you're just providing proofs to support your argument on IQ's
Open challenge
Sort:
0
#43
And at 12 years of age, I didn't expect you to know about any cognitive biases as it was evident in your reasoning unless you have extraordinary intelligence(which you don't obviously given that you're still persistent on spoiling friendly discussions)
0
#44
The reason I wasn't reading this is because the logic you provided earlier wasn't your original one and I don't read stuff about people trynna prove their own point
0
#45
If you think you're crushing me at this point, I haven't seen bigger day dreamers than you
0
#46
MelvinGarvey wrote:
Blah blah.
yeah that's what I expected because you can't seem to interpret and understand original responses
0
#47
And fyi I know that IQ isn't the only aspect in intelligence. example being the case of christopher langan
I just wasn't willing to continue the argument
0
#48
That's just explanations since some people thought that you were in fact an "intelligent" 12 year old
0
#50
MelvinGarvey wrote:
In short: you've made that thread, yet consider that anyone trying to participate in your thread, must be not smart enough since they try to communicate with you and others. Yet, you claim to be very smart...
It sure makes no sense at all. But very original indeed. Lol.
well
this is where you know the opposition ran out of steam and is typing garbage
0
#54
You can't even figure what you're spewing out at this point, I said you were just another 12 y.o. not "dumb" or something..that was only when you weren't able to get that all I was telling you to do is to the read the first page again
0
#55
MelvinGarvey wrote:
No no no, this is, by far, not the only thing you said.
And anyway you keep setting up unfounded claims at random, in the art of who's yelling louder must be right. It's pathetic a level of rethorics.
mention one of em first
0
#56
MelvinGarvey wrote:
RevolvingPotato a écrit :
You can't even figure what you're spewing out at this point
Here you are: one unfounded claim among many others.
Do you need more help in order to remember all the claims you've made since you can't figure out re-reading yourself for the purpose?
But your lack of understanding of what a friendly discussion is has lead to all of this
0
#57
Look around boy
Everyone other than you is on my friends list and ig you didn't even read the first comment, what else would you call this?
Trump up to his old tricks again rabble rousing, the rug he’s wearing on top of his head , isn’t doing him any favours either !
0
#59
MelvinGarvey wrote:
Look around in turn, barely anyone gave you any support, and three posters at least posted against you in this very thread.
I'll let you play in your sandbox boy, I've got other things to attend to.
(I'm gone).
Most of them weren't even aware of this debate
and anyways good riddance
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Well anyways, I ain't reading all that bs
Again, we're having a friendly discussion here and you seem to have been "boomer influenced" which makes you speak like them but your logic and reasoning is much worse than them
If you still want to continue this argument then I'm afraid I'll have to block you for some time