REAL REASON For Climate Change, And MANY OTHER ETCETERAS .

Sort:
DiogenesDue
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:

Lol 🤣 lmao and you wonder why I think your payed

"you're"

"paid"

Talking with you guys is like shooting fish in a barrel. I don't even have to really add anything, you guys show your lack of education willingly, and wear it like a badge of honor.

DiogenesDue
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

My responses were not always the same. But they have become the same, *to you* over time, because all of your ignorant talking points have been debunked *so many times* you got blocked here for pedantically repeated the same blatantly incorrect "facts" over and over again.

The fact that you now hide your new accounts, and that you judiciously avoid mentioning the Holocene (which is the hallmark of your bad climate change science), just demonstrate that you also know you are full of crap, crap that you cannot back up."

You say that about anyone who disagrees with you.

Ermm...no. There's several unique items there I could not "say about anyone".

DiogenesDue
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Elroch: "This is another example of fundamental lack of quantitative intuition. The time scale of the current sharp rise in temperatures is entirely invisible in that graph.

It is virtually the same as if someone said to you "your house is on fire and you need to avoid being burnt to death", and you replied by providing a temperature graph for your house over the last 50 years, pointing out that you were completely safe.

Try to understand these facts.

Temperature changes in the last century are of a similar scale to the total variation over the last 10,000 years

The temperature rise at the moment is about 10 times faster than the rapid changes at the end of the last Ice Age (c. 17,000 years ago)"

So 1,700 years instead of 17,000, big effin deal. Such drama queens.

He said that the end of the last Ice Age was 17,000 years ago. He did not say how long the Ice Age, or the rapid changes at the end of it, were...so dividing 17,000/10 is incorrect. Hopefully you can make your way through this conundrum, given some time...

Take note of how I didn't personally attack you....you owned yourself here.

Henry_Bowman1

Here is what they don’t want people to see, because it proves Co2 is a result of global warming, and not a cause … and I’m still cracking up at the fact they can’t figure out how a greenhouse affects plantlife. 
Look closely at the increasing instability in arctic temperatures over the past 200,000 years. Man adding Co2 to the system is not going to change this pattern in any meaningful way. Temperatures oscillate, but the Co2 concentrations are unaffected by those oscillations. Temperature drives Co2 levels.

DiogenesDue

Good, now why don't you live here with the other crackpots and you can you teach them all your "science"...

Coincidently, you are both the only crackpots that habitually go back and delete all their posts. It's like you are related.

WTFrickenA
DiogenesDue wrote:
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:

Lol 🤣 lmao and you wonder why I think your payed

"you're"

"paid"

Talking with you guys is like shooting fish in a barrel. I don't even have to really add anything, you guys show your lack of education willingly, and wear it like a badge of honor.

The only Diploma of interest to me is not of this world, thus spiritual, so no care what you think of me, because eventually you'll realize I'm for your best wellbeing, just like anyone on cc, even if that eventual aspect leads to that being after every jot and tittle be fulfilled, and you see then just how correct I am. 😂

DiogenesDue
Henry_Bowman1 wrote:

… right on queue! Straight up personal attacks.

If you think those are really "attacks", I guess you won't fare too well on the mod-light forums these days. The observations are valid.

WTFrickenA
Henry_Bowman1 wrote:
DiogenesDue wrote:

Good, now why don't you live here with the other crackpots and you can you teach them all your "science"...

Coincidently, you are both the only crackpots that habitually go back and delete all their posts. It's like you are related.

… right on queue! Straight up personal attacks.

It's actually very rare to see a post that he doesn't, that is if it's directed at debunkers against his 'PAID' self to put such in their place.

DiogenesDue
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:

It's actually very rare to see a post that he doesn't, that is if it's directed at debunkers against his 'PAID' self to put such in their place.

You can't really say much about how I post in general from how I respond on this thread, which is a like a Vegas convention hall full of misinformed posters.

But never let it be said I hang around where I am not welcome. I will happily move along now. I'm sure the thread will chug right along with new and interesting knowledge being imparted...

Here come the last chance Larrys to take free swipes...git 'er done...

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Imagine how many forests would be destroyed with the drastically reduction in co2 that this troll poses. Next he's gonna propose reducing the oxygen in Earth's atmosphere to help curb wildfires.

WTFrickenA

Hell nahh, wildfires.. you mean D.E.W. fires . angry

EndgameEnthusiast2357
DiogenesDue wrote:
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:

It's actually very rare to see a post that he doesn't, that is if it's directed at debunkers against his 'PAID' self to put such in their place.

You can't really say much about how I post in general from how I respond on this thread, which is a like a Vegas convention hall full of misinformed posters.

But never let it be said I hang around where I am not welcome. I will happily move along now. I'm sure the thread will chug right along with new and interesting knowledge being imparted...

Here come the last chance Larrys to take free swipes...git 'er done...

Buddy you literally claimed Earth would be a venus-like planet within 400,000 years. It will take half a billion years for the Earth to even be 1/4 of Venus temperature. And to think that would a problem for humanity by then would inply humans made no technological advancements in half a million years, well thats just sad. Oh and nice job failing to refute any of Henry's points about the Pacific Ocean.

WTFrickenA

🤣

WTFrickenA

What's far more accurate is this ytube right here of, lmao DD, I mean LLuther and him with technology destroying towns by a button!

....do spend few minutes and watch.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

The pattern has not changed in 400,000 years. People are not going to change the pattern. Looking at a 100-200 year timeframe and stating mankind is doomed is ludicrous. Why do so few people live where it is cold compared to where it is warm? Food. Food doesn’t grow in cold climates. As Co2 concentrations increase, plants grow faster, use less water, and sequester up to 3x more carbon than at our current temp and Co2 levels.

Crop yields are significantly higher now than when Co2 levels were at 280ppm, and there are many scientists who now believe without the rising Co2, we would not currently have enough food for 8 billion people. A greener and wetter earth is a positive for mankind, not an impending disaster. People of the past lived through temperature swings much greater than what we see today, with oceans rising so fast it swallowed cities. Some of those cities were covered fast enough to prevent everything from eroding away at a shoreline, so what we are experiencing today is nothing, literally nothing in comparison. Mankind had nothing to do with it, and Co2 had nothing to do with it. Co2 follows global warming. Our earth warmed for 20,000 years, and now we are back in an 80,000 year cooling cycle. Yes, the earth is getting colder no matter what mainstream politics wants people to believe."

Not to mention even if the most drastic swings were now, the records that they say are being shattered are hundredths of a degree difference. Earth is 62.17 degrees on average today, the hottest on record, today its 62.19, another record, today is 62.23, 3 days in a row were the warmest in Earth's history, 62.25, 4 days in a row!!! Even if it drops back to 61 the 5th day. Meanwhile NY had its "first heat wave of the season" according to the drama queen Lonnie Quinn. Which was stunning, as I remember there were at least 6 consecutive 95 degree days earlier this year, so they can't even keep their records/definitions properly consistent. It was in the 100s actual temperature in may of 1999, all heat records were set decades ago, some as early as 1913. (But of course, according to the politicians on here, these are the sets of data that are unreliable and sketchy, and not all the gobbledygook they themselves post here) For all we know these .02 degree differences could be from a string of 50 degree days in January and not from the "hottest July on record". These people want to use averages when it suits them, but specific records when it doesn't.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

No, he blocked me permanently as well. He just insults, copies and pastes random data without knowing how to interpret them, and ignores all the negative consequences of colder whether. Everything you said it totally unreachable. You did nothing wrong. The diog guy in this thread is also a well known troll. BTW, I have a block bypass thread where I'm the OP, I never block anyone and everyone is free to quote posts in threads they are blocked in and reply to them there.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-com-community/anti-blocking-thread-89829715

emgp6
i’m gonna keep saying climate change is cap until someone acknowledges me
WTFrickenA
DiogenesDue wrote:
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:

It's actually very rare to see a post that he doesn't, that is if it's directed at debunkers against his 'PAID' self to put such in their place.

You can't really say much about how I post in general from how I respond on this thread, which is a like a Vegas convention hall full of misinformed posters.

But never let it be said I hang around where I am not welcome. I will happily move along now. I'm sure the thread will chug right along with new and interesting knowledge being imparted...

Here come the last chance Larrys to take free swipes...git 'er done...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qOrxWynAx_w

D.E.W. b*****es !

WTFrickenA

Moulton metal from cars BUT UNHARMED TREES A FT AWAY !  

_________E X P L A I N________

_____________T F_____________

__________T H A T !

emgp6
#594 never mind. imma keep saying it >:)