Stuck in a Quagmire with TT !

Sort:
briansladovich

Cool   I appear to be stuck in a quagmire with Tactics Trainer and the timer appears to be the issue. I managed to get back up to 1200 (1196) after a couple of months on my 3/5 free problems a day but, recently dropped about 80 points.

 

The problem has been trying to solve the problem too quickly, in order to get a good or even a positive score and this can result in disastrous consequences. 

 

I could solve over 95% of these problems without a time restraint (big issue with an older guy), do you think there should be a time penalty on these problems ?

briansladovich

Quagmire Image

chrka

I found that hiding the timer was helpful. Just focus on solving the problems, taking care to calculate till the end, and your rating will go up eventually.

Chessmentor2
chrka wrote:

I found that hiding the timer was helpful. Just focus on solving the problems, taking care to calculate till the end, and your rating will go up eventually.

Not necessarily. The rating system has changed rather recently, maybe in the last 12-24 months or so.

Now, problems which were before rated 1900 and had an average time of 2:00 minutes, are found at a rating of 1050 with an average time of 0:30 minutes.

Also, in the old system, you would get 12-25 points for solving the challenges at 100%. Now, the maximum is 8 to 9 points. So in essence, today it is much more harder to get to decent ratings than players who got their points in the old system.

As you can see from the OP, people playing live at 1700 elo are struggling with problems rated at 1100 (which, again, were in the earlier chess.com system found typically at ratings near 2000). The system is dubious.

If you look at all the people on chess.com with high tactics scores, they all obtained them before 2013. You will be hard-pressed to find individuals who got to say 2000+ within the last 6 months or so. There are some new IM's and GM's on chess.com who are rated 2500+ in everything else except tactics trainer 1100-1300.

chrka
Chessmentor2 wrote:
chrka wrote:

I found that hiding the timer was helpful. Just focus on solving the problems, taking care to calculate till the end, and your rating will go up eventually.

Not necessarily. The rating system has changed rather recently, maybe in the last 12-24 months or so.

Now, problems which were before rated 1900 and had an average time of 2:00 minutes, are found at a rating of 1050 with an average time of 0:30 minutes.

Also, in the old system, you would get 12-25 points for solving the challenges at 100%. Now, the maximum is 8 to 9 points. So in essence, today it is much more harder to get to decent ratings than players who got their points in the old system.

As you can see from the OP, people playing live at 1700 elo are struggling with problems rated at 1100 (which, again, were in the earlier chess.com system found typically at ratings near 2000). The system is dubious.

If you look at all the people on chess.com with high tactics scores, they all obtained them before 2013. You will be hard-pressed to find individuals who got to say 2000+ within the last 6 months or so. There are some new IM's and GM's on chess.com who are rated 2500+ in everything else except tactics trainer 1100-1300.

Hmm... I just got back to using TT after a fairly long break, but it looks fine to me. Just to be sure I did a couple of sessions today (clearing my stats in-between). I also toyed around with the pace to see if that would change things much.

Before my break, I used to have a rating in the mid-1800:s with a highest score of ~1930. Now, if I gave myself about ~20s/problem I ended up at about 1500-1600 after 10 minutes, and when I manage to concentrate properly (my biggest problem right now when I'm playing, ideally I seem to take about 1min/problem), I ended up at 1700 after 15 minutes (25 problems, 21 correct). Lower than before, for sure, but I'm pretty rusty.

Are you using TT on your phone or on the site? I've had some problems before when switching between them and had to clear my stats for TT to work properly.

Btw, the rating change seemed normal as well. Some cut and paste from the stats (and yes, I did play a bit too fast Embarassed):

Sep 23, 2014, 2:01 PM 0073441 1657 1701 2/2 0:50 0:12 Passed (99% | +13)
Sep 23, 2014, 2:00 PM 0453153 1635 1688 2/2 0:55 0:37 Passed (87% | +9)
Sep 23, 2014, 2:00 PM 0132951 1627 1679 5/5 1:11 0:55 Passed (85% | +9)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:58 PM 0150131 1621 1670 2/2 0:26 0:43 Passed (50% | -2)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:57 PM 0521704 1616 1672 2/2 0:57 1:17 Passed (66% | +3)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:55 PM 0035201 1722 1669 2/2 0:38 1:17 Passed (20% | -8)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:53 PM 0037866 1690 1677 1/1 1:02 0:22 Passed (95% | +18)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:46 PM 0020778 1657 1659 3/3 0:50 0:05 Passed (100% | +21)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:45 PM 0529292 1677 1638 0/3 0:59 0:14 Failed (0% | -20)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:45 PM 0022105 1638 1658 2/2 0:37 2:00 Passed (20% | -15)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:43 PM 0025120 1617 1673 2/2 0:41 0:06 Passed (100% | +21)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:42 PM 0029447 1641 1652 1/1 0:30 0:28 Passed (81% | +16)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:42 PM 0022312 1632 1636 3/3 0:48 0:24 Passed (90% | +23)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:41 PM 0167270 1616 1613 2/2 1:16 2:12 Passed (44% | -3)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:39 PM 0024383 1597 1616 2/2 0:37 0:20 Passed (89% | +24)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:38 PM 0034523 1601 1592 0/3 1:51 1:37 Failed (0% | -36)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:36 PM 0029260 1565 1628 2/2 0:33 0:05 Passed (100% | +34)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:36 PM 0375409 1520 1594 6/6 1:15 0:37 Passed (90% | +27)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:35 PM 0056747 1519 1567 1/1 0:44 0:08 Passed (100% | +43)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:35 PM 0098444 1494 1524 2/4 3:01 0:34 Failed (50% | +1)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:34 PM 0038817 1435 1523 2/2 0:48 0:07 Passed (100% | +55)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:33 PM 0038179 1329 1468 1/1 1:01 0:06 Passed (100% | +57)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:33 PM 0512992 1336 1411 3/3 1:08 1:11 Passed (78% | +43)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:32 PM 0049188 1334 1368 1/2 0:51 0:08 Failed (50% | +1)
Sep 23, 2014, 1:31 PM 0064309 1170 1367 3/3 0:36 0:04 Passed (100% | +167)
Chessmentor2

Thank you very much for posting that picture. I think my TT is broken? I can never get over 7 points for solving a problem, let alone 30-50 (!) that seems to be routine in your pictures.


And I was a diamond member just recently, so it can't be a free member related bug.


What could be causing this? I have always been capped to losing 9 points for every failed task, and gaining a maximum of 7 points for every correct one.

Or.. Did they change the scoring algorithm for newly registered players? If they did, that is IMO a horrible decision from the chess.com team. Different people should not be subject to different rules; The points should be the same for everybody.

chrka

What were the ratings for those problems? Where they significantly lower than your rating? (It is possible that the 25 problems I did in that session wasn't enough to stabilize the point difference, but I think the change was the same as in those other sessions I did where I did many more problems.)

About a year and a half ago, TT started giving me problems many hundreds of points below my level. I think they fixed that bug (IIRC, it happened after you exhausted all problems within your rating range — there was a different problem before when you could the same problem several times in a row, fixing that probably led to that bug), but I did have similar problems a couple of months ago after switching between the phone app and the site.

Chessmentor2

They were roughly around my rating or about 50-80 higher. But I never used the phone app, only the site. I have never gotten as many points as indicated in your picture.


Note that when TT first came out, I had another account. I got it quite easily to 2100 in TT. That was years ago. Now, because of this scoring system bug I can barely go above 1200.


As seen in your picture, some challenge with say a 88% correct answer awards you 55 points. I would get only 5 points for the same challenge at 88%, which is ten times less. However if I get it wrong, I always lose 9 points.

chrka

Those 55 points were just because I cleared my stats, after a couple of problems the change becomes smaller (the k-factor decreases with the number of problems attempted).

chrka

Ok, so I did some more problems today. (Had some other stuff to attend to so I wasn't exactly focused, though Undecided.) The rating changes seem to be stable (and normal) ranging from about -10 to +10.

If they're not too important to you, you could always try clearing your stats. As you can see above, your rating should converge pretty fast to its true value (in some sense).

Sep 24, 2014, 11:06 AM 0220171 1677 1704 2/2 0:42 0:12 Passed (97% | +8)
Sep 24, 2014, 11:05 AM 0057063 1684 1696 0/1 1:02 0:41 Failed (0% | -10)
Sep 24, 2014, 11:04 AM 0022218 1678 1706 0/2 0:40 0:25 Failed (0% | -11)
Sep 24, 2014, 11:04 AM 0512390 1743 1717 1/4 1:03 1:15 Failed (18% | -6)
Sep 24, 2014, 11:02 AM 0094692 1729 1723 2/2 0:28 0:27 Passed (81% | +6)
Sep 24, 2014, 11:01 AM 0022285 1737 1717 0/2 0:48 0:25 Failed (0% | -10)
Sep 24, 2014, 11:00 AM 0030057 1707 1727 1/1 0:34 0:36 Passed (78% | +5)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:57 AM 0114728 1695 1722 0/2 0:41 1:26 Failed (0% | -12)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:55 AM 0024169 1660 1734 3/3 1:04 0:41 Passed (87% | +6)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:52 AM 0054945 1715 1728 2/2 0:50 1:07 Passed (66% | +3)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:51 AM 0021250 1706 1725 2/2 1:00 1:12 Passed (72% | +4)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:49 AM 0042193 1691 1721 1/1 1:07 0:33 Passed (90% | +9)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:49 AM 0021980 1687 1712 2/2 0:42 0:49 Passed (73% | +5)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:48 AM 0025091 1693 1707 3/3 0:48 1:39 Passed (20% | -8)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:46 AM 0025722 1663 1715 1/1 0:26 0:24 Passed (82% | +6)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:45 AM 0021721 1753 1709 2/2 0:29 0:11 Passed (94% | +13)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:45 AM 0035308 1747 1696 0/2 0:48 1:35 Failed (0% | -12)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:43 AM 0033134 1739 1708 1/1 0:36 0:28 Passed (84% | +10)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:42 AM 0034051 1727 1698 2/5 2:47 0:38 Failed (40% | -2)
Sep 24, 2014, 10:41 AM 0131279 1715 1700 1/1 0:35 0:59 Passed (48% | -1)
krazeechess

imagine bumping this