He refuses. For what reason? “I’m afraid people will cheat.” Never mind that he claims he can beat Stockfish, but Oh-Kay....
You should go to his thread and challenge him. See what he says.
He refuses. For what reason? “I’m afraid people will cheat.” Never mind that he claims he can beat Stockfish, but Oh-Kay....
You should go to his thread and challenge him. See what he says.
Well I left him a noti and maybe it was engine v. engine! What if Lyudmil designed his own, working engine, better than stockfish!?
What the heck? I looked at his profile he’s never played a game. Not one single game on chess.com
This outrage is how The Secret of Chess has over 7000 posts, most of them annoyed people arguing with him pointlessly
c4 e5 e4 c5.
Hmm ... and it's known classically as Staunton-Cochrane variation.
*e4 c5 c4
What the heck? I looked at his profile he’s never played a game. Not one single game on chess.com
This outrage is how The Secret of Chess has over 7000 posts, most of them annoyed people arguing with him pointlessly
The secret to posts is Debate, Competition, and Opportunity. Just sayin'.
Ummm...I guess that's why just about ALL the top GM's have The English Opening in their repertoire...because it's 'busted'. People...get a life.
Everybody keep up the great work! We cannot have enough posts by narcissistic nitwits with chess engines claiming that they have "refuted" perfectly good openings and variations!
I think there's a few more of those...
I have found the refutation to e4:
And black is easily wining. If white goes 5. or 6. or 7. or 8. or 9.Qh5# he is clearly using an engine
I would like to play this Lyudmil guy