Yeah, it's funny to insult somebody in his own thread. It just says a lot about you.
Truth about chess.com TOS
Sort:
0
#43
It's funny that people like Blarg call me childish when it's difficult to remember a moment when he hasn't behaved in a childish way.
Also gerberk, if you don't like my threads why do you keep posting on them? Is it like a drug for you?
Just took a look at Mr. Bell's profile. No comment.
Don t worry I like your posts King..
Is he what i think he is?
you never know in here King....
wb Don big guy...
Yeah yeah yeah ....never be clever...
kingofshedinjas wrote:
It's funny that people like Blarg call me childish when it's difficult to remember a moment when he hasn't behaved in a childish way.
So, basically, "no u"?
I also now have concerns about your memory.
0
#51
BlargDragon escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
It's funny that people like Blarg call me childish when it's difficult to remember a moment when he hasn't behaved in a childish way.
So, basically, "no u"?
I also now have concerns about your memory.
Ok, I had enough.
0
#52
TOS must ensure that chess.com is never open to any legal challenge or being sued etc...so the TOS are very wordy and boring
0
#53
Well, the TOS doesn't really stop someone from suing Chess.com. If a jury or judge thought that a clause in the TOS was unreasonable, Chess.com could still come out on the short end of the stick.
EscherehcsE wrote:
Well, the TOS doesn't really stop someone from suing Chess.com. If a jury or judge thought that a clause in the TOS was unreasonable, Chess.com could still come out on the short end of the stick.
That's a good point a lot of people forget, that there's a limit to what contracts can bind you to. Unfortunately, few companies consider this, and prefer to rely on the weight a corporate legal team has versus a personal one.
0
#55
EscherehcsE wrote:
Well, the TOS doesn't really stop someone from suing Chess.com. If a jury or judge thought that a clause in the TOS was unreasonable, Chess.com could still come out on the short end of the stick.
TOS are a fallible attempt to achieve the impossible
BoyStan wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:
Well, the TOS doesn't really stop someone from suing Chess.com. If a jury or judge thought that a clause in the TOS was unreasonable, Chess.com could still come out on the short end of the stick.
TOS are a fallible attempt to achieve the impossible
In fairness, though, every set of rules or laws ever written could be characterized that way.
I read the whole thing
Once you get muted once or twice, you learn how the site works.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Diakonia, let me speak through you! My amazing powers of coercion tell you only one thing: UNMUTE me! UNMUTE ME!!!