you made me ChUclE
vote for......
Sort:
Feb 20, 2009
0
#6
i think your.............................
..........................................
..........................................
12
rich wrote:
But I am most active. I have 13187 points.
Ah another one to add to my collection !
You may have the most points, but your contributions, to be blunt, are worthless. Do you remember the thread "Erik owes us yet another apology"? It's long gone, but remember how you could not detect NotKasparov's sarcasm after everyone waved it in front of your face? In response, you said that you should not read the current posts, because it would be silly. You then went on to discuss patzy tournament wins. There was ubiquitous content from you, yet none of it had any value. When voting for the most active member, I would choose the one who contributed the most valuable content. After all, it's quality, not quantity. I don't mean to attack you as a person, but the content that you submit.
rich wrote:
BasicLvrCH8r wrote:
rich wrote:
But I am most active. I have 13187 points.
Ah another one to add to my collection !
You may have the most points, but your contributions, to be blunt, are worthless. Do you remember the thread "Erik owes us yet another apology"? It's long gone, but remember how you could not detect NotKasparov's sarcasm after everyone waved it in front of your face? In response, you said that you should not read the current posts, because it would be silly. You then went on to discuss patzy tournament wins. There was ubiquitous content from you, yet none of it had any value. When voting for the most active member, I would choose the one who contributed the most valuable content. After all, it's quality, not quantity. I don't mean to attack you as a person, but the content that you submit.
It wasn't that I didn't detect the sarcasm, I just deliberately ignored it on purpose; I just couldn't be bothered with sarcasm at that point. And the topic Erik Owes us yet another apology, was worthless in itself because erik doesn't actually owe anyone a apology. It was very stupid.
So you are saying that you actually got the joke, but pretended to be an idiot on purpose? Who's using the family braincell today Baldrick? 
And as the topic was a ironic rant about the exact same thing that you were ranting about, I guess by your logic that makes you stupid aswell. Or are you going to admit that you didn't understand the joke?
rich wrote:
BasicLvrCH8r wrote:
rich wrote:
But I am most active. I have 13187 points.
Ah another one to add to my collection !
You may have the most points, but your contributions, to be blunt, are worthless. Do you remember the thread "Erik owes us yet another apology"? It's long gone, but remember how you could not detect NotKasparov's sarcasm after everyone waved it in front of your face? In response, you said that you should not read the current posts, because it would be silly. You then went on to discuss patzy tournament wins. There was ubiquitous content from you, yet none of it had any value. When voting for the most active member, I would choose the one who contributed the most valuable content. After all, it's quality, not quantity. I don't mean to attack you as a person, but the content that you submit.
It wasn't that I didn't detect the sarcasm, I just deliberately ignored it on purpose; I just couldn't be bothered with sarcasm at that point. And the topic Erik Owes us yet another apology, was worthless in itself because erik doesn't actually owe anyone a apology. It was very stupid.
Oh, my God, you still are missing the sarcasm! Of course Erik didn't owe us an apology! That was the point of the thread! Why would you take someone seriously whom you know to be speaking sarcastically? You have much to learn...
VOTE FOR THEMONKEY FOR THE BEST AUTHOR OF THE MONTH TROPHY, OR MOST ACTIVE.