JackRoach wrote:
No one uses cyclist as an insult.
Yet, pedestrian is insulting.
you dumb cyclist
We need to stop this!
Sort:
May 25, 2021
0
#23
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
No one uses cyclist as an insult.
Yet, pedestrian is insulting.
you dumb cyclist
pedestrian is compliment
May 25, 2021
0
#24
JackRoach wrote:
No one uses cyclist as an insult.
Yet, pedestrian is insulting.
The word cyclist is associated with negative aspects of human characters, and therefore is functional as a valid insult. Pedestrian is seen as more of a compliment if you haven't noticed.
May 25, 2021
0
#25
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
No one uses cyclist as an insult.
Yet, pedestrian is insulting.
The word cyclist is associated with negative aspects of human characters, and therefore is functional as a valid insult. Pedestrian is seen as more of a compliment if you haven't noticed.
Lacking inspiration or excitement is a compliment?
May 25, 2021
0
#26
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
No one uses cyclist as an insult.
Yet, pedestrian is insulting.
The word cyclist is associated with negative aspects of human characters, and therefore is functional as a valid insult. Pedestrian is seen as more of a compliment if you haven't noticed.
Lacking inspiration or excitement is a compliment?
The part of speech is an adjective. Pedestrians are not necessarily pedestrian.
May 25, 2021
0
#27
Pedestrians aren't pedestrian.
Obviously, they aren't. They're apedestrian.
May 25, 2021
0
#28
so
apedestrian= act of being a pedestrian
what does pedestrian mean?
Cyclists aren't cyclists, they are Carlists
May 25, 2021
0
#30
This is according to Merriam-Webster. Of course, they wrote pedestrian instead of apedestrian, but with the recent changes, I understand it may be outdated and need some time to fully accept all my changes with the pedestrian/cyclist revolution.
got em
May 25, 2021
0
#32
JackRoach wrote:
This is according to Merriam-Webster. Of course, they wrote pedestrian instead of apedestrian, but with the recent changes, I understand it may be outdated and need some time to fully accept all my changes with the pedestrian/cyclist revolution.
The modern meaning has changed and is no longer accurate.
May 25, 2021
0
#33
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:
everyone we must stop rickrolls sign this: censored*******
If that's a rickroll, I'll click it! :-)
May 25, 2021
0
#34
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
This is according to Merriam-Webster. Of course, they wrote pedestrian instead of apedestrian, but with the recent changes, I understand it may be outdated and need some time to fully accept all my changes with the pedestrian/cyclist revolution.
The modern meaning has changed and is no longer accurate.
Only philosophers can change words, not dictionary people.
Who do these people think they are? They must be mistaken.
May 25, 2021
0
#35
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
This is according to Merriam-Webster. Of course, they wrote pedestrian instead of apedestrian, but with the recent changes, I understand it may be outdated and need some time to fully accept all my changes with the pedestrian/cyclist revolution.
The modern meaning has changed and is no longer accurate.
Only philosophers can change words, not dictionary people.
Who do these people think they are? They must be mistaken.
well how are you a philosopher?
May 25, 2021
0
#36
May 25, 2021
0
#37
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
This is according to Merriam-Webster. Of course, they wrote pedestrian instead of apedestrian, but with the recent changes, I understand it may be outdated and need some time to fully accept all my changes with the pedestrian/cyclist revolution.
The modern meaning has changed and is no longer accurate.
Only philosophers can change words, not dictionary people.
Who do these people think they are? They must be mistaken.
I'm afraid philosophers don't change words. The general public does, for they are the one who uses the language and test its words in casual conversation and formal documentation
May 26, 2021
0
#38
May 26, 2021
0
#39
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
This is according to Merriam-Webster. Of course, they wrote pedestrian instead of apedestrian, but with the recent changes, I understand it may be outdated and need some time to fully accept all my changes with the pedestrian/cyclist revolution.
The modern meaning has changed and is no longer accurate.
Only philosophers can change words, not dictionary people.
Who do these people think they are? They must be mistaken.
I'm afraid philosophers don't change words. The general public does, for they are the one who uses the language and test its words in casual conversation and formal documentation
Your feebleness is amusing.
No one uses cyclist as an insult.
Yet, pedestrian is insulting.