Edited

Sort:
Gregg-Turkington
Whatever, don’t try to deflect by blaming mike or anyone else for your own actions.

Besides, it’s not all about you either. Witkrag and summersaint have been just as creepy as you’re being. It’s been reported, let the admin address it and hopefully correct measures will be taken.

I for one, will be keeping a very close eye on chess.com’s response just as any concerned parent or guardian should. Unfortunately there is too little parental involvement on this site so that needs to be taken into consideration by the admin.

This has been very clear and out in the open. To miss it is like not realizing that you’ve been hit by a Mack truck.
TheHarbingerOfDoom
Your going to have to explain it to me Joseph? What’s clear and out in the open?
Woollensock2
I’m not deflecting anything, so just shut up . You are obviously completely blind to the truth of what’s going on here .
Bulliedofthesite

I am not fussed about you blocking me. It makes no difference to my life. My concern is your intentions and why you keep up the pretence

Woollensock2
For heaven’s sake, is it so terrible that I pretend to be a cat . There’s nothing wrong with that, many members on this site do exactly the same thing .
Bulliedofthesite

Speaking in the first person is a massive improvement :)

Woollensock2
Also you know darn well that there are no underlying intentions, to my playing the role of a cat . This just something that you are using, in an attempt to poison the minds of people against me . You really are a disgusting individual.
Woollensock2
Also you are a pathetic lier to say your not fussed about my blocking you , the fact that you continue to harass me proves otherwise .
TheBestBeer_Root
mikekelcey wrote:

An adult pretending to be a cat in order to develop online relationships with kids. That is enough. Then there is the nature of some of his comments to children. It may not be grooming but is very much looks like it

I find what his message is only representing his concern their best interests, not a thing regarding interests in any sense of grooming, but, dude, he’s for to defend them, because he’s a big heart to the children, and if I’m wrong then this moment is a perfect time anyone who’s had any pm out of order to share here what was said, and we find out if it’s legitimate or someone against woolly.

Woollensock2
Your talking a load of rubbish
TheBestBeer_Root

lmao dude… wtf I just stated you weren’t 

TheBestBeer_Root

How’s that?

Woollensock2
Beer I misread your post sorry !
MarkoHoog

I think he wasn't talking about you TheBestBeer_Root

jewelqueen52
@rich reported for cursing and rudeness
Woollensock2
@rich is another dude that I have previously blocked, that’s why he’s
TheBestBeer_Root
Woollensock2 wrote:
Beer I misread your post sorry !

is it because you have me blocked and just thought I was against you, and so then agreeing with mike, on his views ??

TheBestBeer_Root

Yo rich….. perhaps you can explain why you just blocked my inquiry on text about you finding me weird, yeah ?

Woollensock2
rich is just being an obnoxious little boy, by joining the bandwagon that’s now in progress against me ………and for your information little boy , I do not have multiple accounts .
TheBestBeer_Root

weird

This forum topic has been locked