for staff, a must read

Sort:
Avatar of DLKIII
Martin_Stahl wrote:
mynameisbumpa wrote:
...

all-in-all i think you have a much higher opinion of yourself and your contributions to this site than are warranted. if i am wrong, go ahead and cite me a specific example of it. again. .... [snip]....show me i'm wrong. your claim of good intents don't really mean anything to anyone but you.

My contributions are what they are. Sometimes I'm wrong but I try my best.

Regarding the bots answer, staff say they don't use them, so if they say they don't, that's the answer. Believe it or not; I do and I state that they don't based on that and a long history of them being very candid and from content they have posted previously.

I also don't need to give you any examples of anything. I have over tens of thousand of posts out there ... I'm certainly not going to go down a rabbit hole to justify anything to satisfy your curiosity. It's all there in public so if you're that concerned you're welcome to read up

martin, martin, martin...where should i begin?

1. your contributions are what they are. agreed. there is certainly no doubt about that.

2. sometimes you are wrong. no doubt about that either.

3. you try your best. if you say this is your best, i have no reason to doubt you.

4. regarding bots issue, once again i dont care if they are used in live games. but if your statement is made solely on what the staff tells you, it's anyone's guess as to whether this is true or not. i admit i have no idea if this is true. but neither do you! however if you are in any way an honest man, you will have to admit your response to my question 'how do you know?' is completely lacking in value and not something an average person would consider in any way intelligent.

5. you don't need to give me examples of anything. very true. especially when you can't because they don't exist!

6. you say you welcome me to read up on your posts. no thanks. i dont think i will learn much doing that.

take care, martin!

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

20 posts in the last 2 pages?......yeah, that's your fault. You like to de-rail other people's threads don't you?

Avatar of DLKIII
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

20 posts in the last 2 pages?......yeah, that's your fault. You like to de-rail other people's threads don't you?

are you talking to me?

Avatar of Sir_TrashPanda
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

20 posts in the last 2 pages?......yeah, that's your fault. You like to de-rail other people's threads don't you?

Just a sad little troll that loves to argue for no reason. Probably hates animals too.

Avatar of DLKIII
Sir_TrashPanda wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

20 posts in the last 2 pages?......yeah, that's your fault. You like to de-rail other people's threads don't you?

Just a sad little troll that loves to argue. Probably hates animals too.

seriously, guys? you can't find an actual argument so you result to name calling? i think that says it all abou you.

Avatar of Sir_TrashPanda
mynameisbumpa wrote:
AlCzervik wrote:
mynameisbumpa wrote:
AlCzervik wrote:

i will bump this thread until staff responds. martin, you provide ample answers at times, but this is not one. writing that there are a high number of tickets as a probable answer is still unacceptable.

you make it sound as if training to be a mod or staff is intense! that is nonsense, as far as i'm concerned. in my opinion, it's as if the powers that be simply consider the members morons.

if you havent noticed, martin_stahl is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

on the issue where you quote me, yes, i was disappointed. your feedback, though, is a personal attack, instead of mentioning any relevant issue. if you have any, post them. i bet that, even after your insult, martin will respond.

please note that i mention staff frequently, and, in the title! that is the elephant in the thread here, not martin. not a single staff member will bother, which is sad. it's as if development has usurped function.

you are certainly entitled to your opinion. martin, however, is a site apologist and general, all around simpleton.

No argument so you "result to name calling" by calling Martin_Stahl a simpleton. Great job Professor of Logic.

Avatar of AwesomeAtti

[Locking this thread due to repeated violations of Chess.com's Community Policy.]

This forum topic has been locked