i will tell you that a mod that went by the name of gchess ended a topic about improving the site. here is the topic: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/erik-we-are-frustrated
when i reached out to shaun and erik about this, their responses were completely lame.
shaun decided to go back to a time i was muted, instead of responding to the issue.
erik wrote a contrived message about how a ceo can't manage everything. this is after he had written that the topic offered good suggestions.
Gchess was a new mod at the time, and in any case soon after that gchess wasn't a mod anymore.
I don't know what shaun told you, but erik's response seems completely reasonable.
Your topic can simultaneously have good suggestions in it and be redundant. Maybe they were thinking the other avenues were enough and that's why it wasn't unlocked.
I feel a bit like the devil's advocate here since we probably agree on a lot of things... or maybe I just like to argue. Oh well.
some people dont want to use chesskid, and i can't blame them. 14 and 15 year olds can very easily be in the conversation, and they can be mods easily. yeah, the kids who cant count up to 100 should go to chesskid, but i'm talking now abt the more mature kids, the teens and such
thinking that early teens are capable of keeping up with adult conversation is plain dumb. thinking that they are capable of moderating conversation here is more dumb.
I guess I'm in a friendly mood because... sure, I agree, but it's kinda harsh saying so. No one realizes this while they're still kids.