Thanks for your comments Hypocrism..... Yeah I know that, but in my opionion the old rating of both the opponents (at the start of the game) should be reflected in the archive games so that the game of both the players can be compared/analysed according to their actual rating and not on adjusted rating.
For example, in my case, I played my first game at 1200 rating against a higher rated player of me but after finishing the game my rating shows 1417. If anyone compares the game, he/she can think that I defeated the opponent who was rated lesser than me which would not be corrected.
So I emphasize to Chess.com that actual/old rating should be shown in Archive Games insterad of New one.
Thanks for your comments Hypocrism..... Yeah I know that, but in my opionion the old rating of both the opponents (at the start of the game) should be reflected in the archive games so that the game of both the players can be compared/analysed according to their actual rating and not on adjusted rating.
For example, in my case, I played my first game at 1200 rating against a higher rated player of me but after finishing the game my rating shows 1417. If anyone compares the game, he/she can think that I defeated the opponent who was rated lesser than me which would not be corrected.
So I emphasize to Chess.com that actual/old rating should be shown in Archive Games insterad of New one.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/players-rating-in-archive-games