I agree,
Say you are playing a team match and this is the roster:
and team a locks their roster and team b takes out their lowest 5 rated players and lock their roster, the game is not fair.
Hope that made sense
I agree,
Say you are playing a team match and this is the roster:
and team a locks their roster and team b takes out their lowest 5 rated players and lock their roster, the game is not fair.
Hope that made sense
...So in these ways we can have a balanced/fair team matches.
...
For a fair match, challenge http://www.chess.com/groups/home/close-match
Excerpt from Mission Statement:
"Through negotiation between teams, set the pairings so either team has a chance of winning the match. This means registered players will be judiciously cut to even out the pairings. This makes it more fun for all."
Current team matches.
http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match.html?id=72518
http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match.html?id=73207
http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match.html?id=73818
http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match.html?id=74725
http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match.html?id=75454
Note: Autostart is not compatible with negotiations.
- do not make 1+ matches but for example 10-15 players
- before you lock our team ask the other team captain if both can lock now!
Sorim,
Even you set 10+ or 30+ players, same problem applicable, if 40+ tables registered and the other captain removes the 10 after locking?
Also, even after dicussing with captains, we cannot rely any. Human has the tendancy to break and violate any code of conduct.
So, everything should be controlled by the system.
Anyways, nowadays i set matches as +10, +25... at lease i get some fair play!
i request chess.com development team to make a change asap,
So in these ways we can have a balanced/fair team matches.
Chess.com admins please get back on this.
thanks, aarwin