20002 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What do you think ?
Define what good is. Good in relation to all chess players, a group, family, or your own goal? What kind of rating?
I mean average is 1200 I think.
Judge yourself. http://www.chess.com/echess/players
thanks thats realy cool !
I think 1581 is pretty good for a 13 year old. You have time to improve and become really good!
Me, I'll die a contented patzer, but you can do better.
jeez thanks ! I am 12 btw.
1581 is generally a strong junior, although of course nowhere near the ranks of the top ones.
Not for a grandmaster
Depends on your goals. But generally speaking it's not bad at all, mate! :)
Thanks its better than I though.
Thanks; its better than I though.
Sorry @SebbyLeb, but your average opponents are fully 400 points below you in all three rating systems. Clean up your act.
NO, you're a lazy player who (chronically) plays weaker opponents.
Set you rating range at plus and minus 150, then see what happens.
Nice photo, in any case.
thanks but I play people rated 2100 unrated ( not lazy bro I work my but off every day )
You habitually play weak computers in standard chess, too. What's up with that?
Sorry, but that's a complete waste of your time.
Whatever. Knock yourself out.
Your unrated in online so I wouldnt talk if i wear you...
he probably couldn't talk if you were to wear him.
I fell out of my chair laughing.
I am a 1500ish rated player. I enjoy learning and very competitive games so I tend to look for the 1600 and up players. I have beaten or "tied" a few of the better rated players and have recently added the "tatics training" to my skill development to try to cure my blind spots and knowledge deficiencies. I wouldn't do well in a timed tournament, but I am growing in my tactics and skills. Just as there are tactical skills and playing styles in other games/sports (I am a national ranked table tennis player - just took another medal in the recent Senior Games in Cleveland, OH), training and practice make you more perfect.
"1600 Online" is not very strong. Sorry. That rating wears (sic) poorly.
According to your game score, your average opponents are only rated 1100 in Blitz, Bullet, and Standard. That wears (sic) rather poorly, as well.
Johnan Hellsten's (3 new books) are definitely worth studying. Perhaps you can get Mom to buy them for you?
Consider posting less threads. Improve your game instead. You'll be a better man for it.
Have a Nice Day.
Chess at top level is rather boring
by GnrfFrtzl a few minutes ago
What's wrong with people on chess.com?
by 1NaturalDisaster a few minutes ago
I mostly feel pressurized by the ticking clock
by acter a few minutes ago
Dude I drawed the worlds best chess engine KOMODO technically
by Xen1227 a few minutes ago
pawns ruins the game
by ILikeBasins 2 minutes ago
Woman are inferior to Men period.
by 1NaturalDisaster 4 minutes ago
Women aren't smart enough
by 1NaturalDisaster 6 minutes ago
Game Drawn Insufficient Material
by eslamo00o 8 minutes ago
2/14/2016 - Quick And Painless Mate
by ChessFail10000 15 minutes ago
Not getting credit for wins!
by sober10 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!