Use of "their" in lessons for singular to be PC

Sort:
Rglambsb
Your use of "their" for white, black, him, or her is confusing and grammatically wrong. Reader can't tell if you are talking about one player or both in some cases. Plus it's terribly annoying to native English speakers and a disservice for those trying to improve their English. PLEASE correct this stupidity. If you have to be PC, as opposes to grammatically correct, I suggest just alternating the use of him and her.
Martin_Stahl

Usage of their as a gender neutral pronoun is an accepted grammatical device in English.

Rglambsb
That's true in the plural, not the singular. How does "Black needs to protect their knight" sound to you?  I suggest his, her, or the - all are a better option than their.  E.G., John played their bishop is obviously not correct; John played his bishop or White played her bishop, or White played the bishop are OK.
Camodude

I think this "their" thing is stupid. If someone is not sure of another person's gender they should use "he/she" not "their."

Fiveoutofseven

Maybe it's a regional thing, but where I come from using 'their' to refer to just one person is perfectly normal, and as already mentioned, using it to refer to one person is actually gramatically correct.

 

A quick google search shows that the definition of 'their' is: (used with a singular indefinite pronoun or singular noun antecedent inplace of the definite masculine his or the definite feminine her):

Someone left their book on the table. It's good for the teacher to havehigh expectations for their students.
Bramblyspam

These days, singular "they" is considered to be grammatically correct. It's endorsed by the style guides of major publications such as the Washington Post. Indeed, singular "they" was the American Dialect Society's word of the year in 2015. Historically, it was used by authors ranging from Shakespeare to Jane Austen. It wasn't until the 1800's that some grammarians got together and tried to set a different standard.

Thankfully, we're finally getting over that. Who really wants to use clunky phrases like "he or she" anyway?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f21t7DRKlg8 

BlargDragon

There will always be grammar pedants.

'he/she' and 'his/hers' are clunky. 'It' and 'its' are demeaning. There are handfuls of new pronouns proposed, but people can't agree on one, much less push one to be used in the mainstream. 'they' and 'their' are there and already in use, and I can't recall once being confused by context.

"John played their bishop..." is fine if we have reason to doubt John's gender identity. When we don't, we use 'he'. Likewise, if we don't know who's playing their bishop at all, we do what I just did there until we find out it's none other than John himself.

Pronoun reappropriation has happened several times before in other languages, and I'm sure their language pedants got their cotton twisted too, but they got over it and let the living organism known as language do its thing.

MarcoBR444

Interesting thread.

As a native Portuguese language, I tend to agree to MArtin's post.

 

Martin_Stahl  

Usage of their as a gender neutral pronoun is an accepted grammatical device in English.

LegoPirateSenior

I sympathize with the OP; he or she expressed his or her viewpoint quite clearly. I just hope that he or she will not find himself or herself targeted by the politically correct crowds.

happy.png Sorry, could not resist...wink.png

Rglambsb

The simplest way is to use "the". "White moved the knight to C3", to me, is way  better than "White moved their knight to C3". [team chess? communal piece?] To me, "their" is cringeworthy each time I read it. Second best, as many pubs do, is use his in half the lessons and her in the other half. I'm male, I wouldn't care if they use her in every lesson.

ModestAndPolite

Use of "their" to refer to just one person, as a way of avoiding the ugly his/hers construction may or may not be grammatical, but it is widely used, widely understood, and it is no use complaining about it  (or merely saying "I don't like it")  because that is not going to make it go away.

I disapprove of the loss of many useful words.  For example "enormity" these days is rarely used to mean anything other than big, and to say that "we had a gay time", which once meant simply that we had had fun now produces schoolboy smirks and giggles.  We have lost shades of meaning in many more words than those, but there is nothing I can do about it.

Usage changes.  There are better ways to spend ones life than railing against the inevitable.

I think Mr. Covey had it right in his ideas of "circle of influence" and "circle of concern" even if he spoiled his great book by trying to recruit new followers to Christianity alongside describing the seven habits.

BlargDragon
Rglambsb wrote:

The simplest way is to use "the". "White moved the knight to C3", to me, is way  better than "White moved their knight to C3". [team chess? communal piece?] To me, "their" is cringeworthy each time I read it. Second best, as many pubs do, is use his in half the lessons and her in the other half. I'm male, I wouldn't care if they use her in every lesson.

Your proposal is that instead of altering the aesthetics of the language to reflect modern usage, we should instead damage the functionality of it in a way for which there's no trending precedent.

Did you think of this switch while you were brushing the teeth?

Rglambsb

Are you kidding me? You think "their" is aesthetically pleasing? Using their is not modern usage, it's just grammatically wrong. You can have an excuse for anything.

jonnin

Why woud anyone want to be PC?   The correct PC is to refer to all as "it".  That way you cannot produce a "microagression" for it by accidentally assuming a gender identity for it or implying that it has a race or something like that.   The best PC plural version is debatable, but any generic term like "beings" or "entities" will do so long as the term has no gender or racial implications.  Naturally this produces stupid sounding english, but that is OK for PC; I think it might actually be the POINT of PC.  This works.  After about a week of refering to an annoying PC police person as "it", they usually go away and leave you to speak correct english in peace.

Ziryab
It is still frowned upon in formal academic writing, which mainly avoids pronouns anyway. But, as others have pointed out, "their" is now considered an acceptable singular pronoun.

Neither Shakespeare nor Jane Austen would write the sorts of sentences that have become common today, but it is true that both used "their" in the singular on occasion.

Years ago, my youngest son came home from kindergarten (he's in his mid-20s now) with a note that said, "When your child arrives at school have them put their coat in their locker." That sort of writing exhibits laziness, not the necessity of using "their" as a gender neutral singular pronoun. Citing Jane Austen in defense of such garbage fills my mouth with bile.
Rglambsb

Their still grates, no matter what the PC snowflakes say

SilentKnighte5

I always say "his" even if I know the player is female.

wanmokewan

You can always learn a language where you can omit pronouns and it still makes sense, like Japanese or Spanish. Besides that, get used to being annoyed with English.

fuzzbug

While I am sympathetic to your cause, OP, I find it hard to ally myself with anyone that argues for grammatic correctness, then uses the phrase "way better."

Murgen
Rglambsb wrote:

The simplest way is to use "the". "White moved the knight to C3", to me, is way  better than "White moved their knight to C3". [team chess? communal piece?] To me, "their" is cringeworthy each time I read it. Second best, as many pubs do, is use his in half the lessons and her in the other half. I'm male, I wouldn't care if they use her in every lesson.

White moved their knight, or their opponent's?

"White moved the knight to C3" is merely a verbose way of communicating "Nc3".