16151 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
please add this! I would start paying again for this feature.
So, now that puts us at 65 VOTES YAY and 2 VOTES NAY.
I think it's "yea" not "yay."
So, now that puts us at 64 VOTES YAY and 2 VOTES NAY.
Worrior? yes or nay?
Who's vote was that?
66 VOTES YAY and 2 VOTES NAY.
Ok, is anyone from chess.com staff rading this? Any comment, staff?
I don't know!
We need chess 960 here. It was one of the things which made ICC great, and I did not mind paying yearly fees, as did for ten+ years, but the owners and admins would not enforce courtesy standards, so I left. Believe me, I know what I am talking about, had breakfast with the President of ICC, in Seattle, recommended by one of the top Grand Masters in the United States, once world top twelve and latter on, a long ninety minute call from the new President of ICC, who called me from Spain. I consulted to them. The recommendation was of me as person who knows enterprise with chess, not chess with enterprise.
Latter, I made a serious, well documented complaint, with screen shots, and the vacume there is not acceptable to me.
I love chess.com. Lets get 960 into blitz, it is a great test of chess strength, and yes, those who play it do tend to be rated a lot higher, on the average.
With the increasing help and influence of computers/engines in standard chess, Fischer Random will be great, please introduce it to live chess~! Players have been asking for it for quite a while T.T
Any idea how much it would cost to add this feature?
So, now that puts us at 69 VOTES YES and 2 VOTES NO.
Thanks for the posts. The more of it the better. Whether that someone from the staff reads it or not does not matter, important is our commitment to Chess 960. My understanding of piece movment has become better and for me it is good to play both, normal and 960.
I vote no because it will be twice as hard to find a game.
Totally agree with you guys. We need Live chess960 (not only blitz, bullet & standard too).
70 votes yes and 3 votes no.
70 votes for yes! Wooohhhoo!!!
Any add to the site should be good. Those who like this idea, will just benefit from it. And those who don't like it, then don't play it.
Like 5 dollars.
One of the features of ChessCube over Chess.com is the ability to play blitz chess960 and I'm surprised the owners of this site havn't even suggested aading chess960 to blitz, it would be great and Im definitely in favour of it!
What should I study to reach 1500 OTB?
by I_Am_Second a few minutes ago
12/13/2013 - Back Rank Power
by UselessAgent a few minutes ago
OTB Game I played recently.
by Zigwurst a few minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by catlover123456 a few minutes ago
I am quitting chess.
by TheARBChessSystem 3 minutes ago
this variation in the benko gambit modern variation
by 253niceguy206 6 minutes ago
by bjohn123 7 minutes ago
Kramnik (Black) wins
by rooperi 7 minutes ago
Is this a good training routine?
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 10 minutes ago
by smooth-operator 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!