11411 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I joined a match with the Bobby Fisher Group and was matched up with a player over 300 rating points than myself.I went through his online games to discovered he had a 90% win rate, and they were mostly against 2000+ players. My mindset going in was dubious to say the least, but I thought back when I won an (1800-2000) tournament with a score of 9/10, so I took the gloves off and prepared to throw down.
Was there a rush to take the knight? Are you not able to move your bishop to safety first?
Brilliant game though.
Will I analyzed the position and knew I had him beat to the punch. Moving the bishop to safety may had given him chances for more counter-play or to defend, and you don't want to give someone at the level that oppurtunity,when you know that you can progress with the initiative and advantage, without taking chances.
Yeah I think I'm a bit material obsessed, the passed pawn was more important in the end and one tempo could change everything in a position like that.
Exactly, with experts if there's a move out, they will find it. To the contrary, if there's a way to win material, they will find it as well. I couldn't have said it better mtself. When playing high-leveled players, every move counts.The game can be determinely decisive by a solitary move.
I don't see a defence for white after the simple 18...Bxe7 (instead of giving up a ton of material for the queen) e.g. 19.Qxe7 Bf5 with a few not-so-subtle threats like Nxa2+, Qxa2, Qd3, Nd3+ and so on.
Factly, for the longest part of the game both opponents did not pay any attention to the opponents threats, no matter if they were realistic, or not.
I find it hard to believe that a player rated about 2000 would ever play such a move as 4...Qc5, unless it either was a bullet game, or he was totally drunk.
Online chess is alittle inflated isnt it?
Very nice material inbalance, i like it
@ IM pfren after bxe7 qxe7 bxd1 rxd1 nxd5 and white has 2 minor peices for a rook. I grant you its the best way to go, but by no means winning for black
I also disagree when you said that we weren't paying attention to threats. Like move 9 when black played ng4. That would've cost me the game if i hadn't played Qe2.
That light squared bishop is worth more than a rook. I trust the IM knows what hes talking about, he sugested Bxe7 Qxe7 Bf5! when Nxa2# is one threat you have to deal with, another is Qd3 followed by Qc2#. The light squares around whites king are fataly weak.
I have a 1948 USCF rating and made far more obvious inaccracies that he made. Is that where you get your kicks? Pointing out the shortcomings of weaker players than yourself, so you feel better bout yourself, beause you have an IM title. Regardless of what your opibion is. It was still a good game. Oh yeah, It was correspondende chess.
Is that where you get your kicks? Pointing out the shortcomings of weaker players than yourself, so you feel better bout yourself, beause you have an IM title.
A weird remark.
If you cannot stand criticism regarding your brilliancies, which may eventually be blunders, then you really should not publish your games, on the first place.
Well, since you said it that way, I can't dsagree. My brilliancy,which weren't blunders, I could not have said it better myself. The only inaccuracy on my part was moving 13.rhe1 instead of g4. This is my favorite high-ranked game. It's a queen sacrifice followed by a mate in 7.
You're a pretty good chess player. Far better than I ever hope to be.
That being said, anyone who calls themselves brilliant multiple times (in any discipline, for that matter) is most likely not brilliant.
Anyway, thanks for posting two exciting games. Good stuff.
My brilliancy,which weren't blunders, I could not have said it better myself.
Actually, you did say it yourself (since that's not what he said).
@IM pfren Theres a difference between constructive criticism and telling someone that they weren't paying attention to proper threats, or irrelevant ones. I found it to be a rude, patronizing, snidely,and offensive remark. When you tell somebody that they'ye game is trash, at least say one thing nice about it. Don't get me wrong. I respect IM's, but it doesn't give them a badge to act impertinent.
@AndyCifton Now, I see why you have two black eyes.
Grabbing the Queen for Queening
by Prudentia 6 minutes ago
can monkey's play chess?
by Boogalicious 6 minutes ago
Chess for Oldtimers --- Good Idea !
by ash369 7 minutes ago
8/23/2014 - Kupper - Olafsson, Zurich 1956
by marsuplami 16 minutes ago
Bugs On Chess.com
by mike_tal 20 minutes ago
by omar_kj 40 minutes ago
Go VS Chess
by Shakaali 44 minutes ago
How Should I Train My Son?
by najdorf96 59 minutes ago
How many legal (possible) positions are there in chess?
by Dingoman25 60 minutes ago
French Lardy Chess pieces
by Reza_BEY_BRAHIM 67 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!