14990 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
lol, so many bishops
My most embarrassing game that I can recall is my one agaisnt MSC157. I don't recall the full game but we followed the famous Anand Kasparov blitz match until I was up about 4 pawns.
Now, I can't resist posting one of the most embarrassing games my friend played:
I've got several, but one in recent memory was when I played in a tournament last year. I was 3 pawns up on an expert when I hit the 5 minute mark and I managed to lose!
Another 'instructive' gem from my youth that told on my lack of endgame knowledge:
I resigned here, but white actually blundered. 1...Kc8! leads to a draw
You guys have nothing on me.
This is a real 30|0 game I played embarrassingly recently.
Unfortunately I played it more than a month ago, so I don't have the PGN in my archives.
it's just a pawn, don't resign so quickly. :)
charetter's is hilarious
i dont have any. all my games i've provided quality and the losses were just bad luck or random guess from opponents. but then again i'm superior than miserable people like u
I believe I can be a prolific contributor to this thread...
Missing a clear advantage or even mate early in the game is a very common motif in my game history. Here's a game I played yesterday (15|10 time controls):
I have many more entertaining (and frustrating) games.
Another just in.
I like to experiment with unusual openings. But unusual openings are unusual for a reason -- mainly because they're somewhat unsound. In this case, my attempt to play the black side of the "Balogh Gambit" (1.e4 d6 2.d4 f5) went terribly wrong. My opponent and I both followed "theory" (an old article from ChessCafe.com) for the first 4 moves. Clearly my 5th move was not good enough, since I failed to prevent white's strong move 6.Ng5. Being the exchange and a pawn down against a solid player, and far behind in development, I so no reason to continue the game. On the bright side, my king did enjoy a nice walk ...
A lesson on how to checkmate yourself.
Which Anti-Sicilian to choose?
by jambyvedar 4 minutes ago
Proposal for a "Gentlemen" setting
by glamdring27 4 minutes ago
Benet Academy Board 4; Paul Severino (black) Conference Match 3
by ProfessorPowerPawn 6 minutes ago
Best Hand-Held Device for Chess?
by donblonde22 10 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by Rambo2004 12 minutes ago
11/25/2015 - Cat And Mouse
by coolguy2007 15 minutes ago
by jjrehp 16 minutes ago
Black Friday deals
by kaynight 20 minutes ago
Bad bug in code?
by etc2000chess 23 minutes ago
beginner learning: How much do the details matter?
by coffeethyme 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!