I gained 600 points in first 6 months. Then I gained 500 points in the following 15 months. It is much easier to gain points when you are starting out. Going from 1200 to 2200 is a big deal. After you reach 1500 improvement gets really slow.
lol, I've been stuck at 2200 for a long time now...
lol i have the same feeling
yeah i know and thats why i said 4 months but for blitz right?
lmao. you really don't know the strength of 2300+ players clearly
I gained 600 points in first 6 months. Then I gained 500 points in the following 15 months. It is much easier to gain points when you are starting out. Going from 1200 to 2200 is a big deal. After you reach 1500 improvement gets really slow.
lol, I've been stuck at 2200 for a long time now...
lol i have the same feeling
ikr
beginners really should focus and tactics, what's the point of getting a space advantage and a winning plan, if you blunder back rank mate?
would you really want to be:
The person who gets a winning position
or
The person who cheeses his opponent in a losing position?
a losing position with still a lot of pieces left is still playable if the two people are beginners.
So you're saying beginners should get in losing positions because their opponents can't convert?
im saying it's playable, but it's not like you will get into losing positions every game, the opponent will blunder too
yeah i know and thats why i said 4 months but for blitz right?
lmao. you really don't know the strength of 2300+ players clearly
*cough cough* 2-0 *cough cough*
yes i have no idea what their strength is
yeah i know and thats why i said 4 months but for blitz right?
lmao. you really don't know the strength of 2300+ players clearly
*cough cough* 2-0 *cough cough*
3|2 is a vastly different time control than 3+0 ngl
also me playing the najdorf didn't help either
yeah i know and thats why i said 4 months but for blitz right?
lmao. you really don't know the strength of 2300+ players clearly
well you are overrated in bullet so i would not say the same thing
we're talking about blitz here lmao
look at the accuracies lmao
you have to play strong chess
probably because you played like trash, so they obviously got high accuracies, and besides, accuracy doesn't tell much
today's lesson:
it's much harder to flex on a bunch of 2000s than a bunch of 1000s
totally wrong
look at the accuracies lmao
you have to play strong chess
in TWO DAYS there are TWO 99 accuracies
THREE games with under 90 accuracy but over 80
Five more games with 90 accuracy
today's lesson:
it's much harder to flex on a bunch of 2000s than a bunch of 1000s
totally wrong
1000s are underated ( it took me 100+ moves and a time advantage to win one on another site)
look at the accuracies lmao
you have to play strong chess
probably because you played like trash, so they obviously got high accuracies, and besides, accuracy doesn't tell much
literally means nothing unless you have be a 2900 machine
proves my point, if you play slightly worse, then they take you apart slowly, inducing more and more mistakes.
look at the accuracies lmao
you have to play strong chess
probably because you played like trash, so they obviously got high accuracies, and besides, accuracy doesn't tell much
literally means nothing unless you have be a 2900 machine
proves my point, if you play slightly worse, then they take you apart slowly, inducing more and more mistakes.
but if you don't play like trash...
look at the accuracies lmao
you have to play strong chess
probably because you played like trash, so they obviously got high accuracies, and besides, accuracy doesn't tell much
literally means nothing unless you have be a 2900 machine
proves my point, if you play slightly worse, then they take you apart slowly, inducing more and more mistakes.
but if you don't play like trash...
you don't get a second chance.
what are you even trying to prove B1Z, like we are not idiots and know that 2200 isn't simple but its not like something impossible and dramatic as you make it to be
lmao you literally think getting to 2400 is that simple
No, your flippant attitude of "if I tried I could be 2400" just pisses me off.
five years ago I was in elementary school feeling really depressed that all my friends got over 1000 uscf and Im still struggling to stay above 900.
you have to play strong chess
beginners really should focus and tactics, what's the point of getting a space advantage and a winning plan, if you blunder back rank mate?
would you really want to be:
The person who gets a winning position
or
The person who cheeses his opponent in a losing position?
a losing position with still a lot of pieces left is still playable if the two people are beginners.
So you're saying beginners should get in losing positions because their opponents can't convert?