The usual backup for silly, unfounded claims can vary.
- A bullet game against a 1200- player is presented as hard evidence.
- "This is certain. My 2650+ GM trainer told me so". Of course the GM's name is a top secret, unless the GM has died recently.
- "This is so because the earth is yellow. If it was green, then it would be a watermelon". (typical x_player logic).
- "The position is full of hidden dynamism". Of course this should provide ample compensation for being two pieces and one pawn down.
- "Nobody knows how to play that at my level". This, at the very least, proves that the claimer does have a level.
- "Playing the right moves is boring". Apparently dropping wood at random is exciting, though...
But Areg7 broke every previous record:
"My improvement doesn't matter- there is no refutation to it."
OK, let it be so, sir. Your opinion doesn't matter, too: It's of the same quality as your nonexistent proof.
I am sorry Sir.
However, the Traxler isn't possible in the Fried Liver Attack.
The fact, you are arguing against Areg7 about it makes me laugh!
The below position is the Fried Liver Attack.
Any positions before move 6 are not called the Fried Liver Attack.
💧 + 🍈 = 🍉
Question for the IM's. How would you play the Na5 line as black?