Im 1600 uscf but 2100 Rapid Lichess.... so...
What should a 10-11 year old's rating be?
Sort:
Jul 25, 2020
0
#123
I am ten and my bullet rating is about 1500. My blitz rating is 1300
Jul 26, 2020
0
#125
Roger436 hat geschrieben:
Im 1600 uscf but 2100 Rapid Lichess.... so...
The other website has hugely inflated ratings. It´s one reason I don´t like to play there because it feels so stupid being labelled a 2000+ level player when I´m clearly not. Chess.com isn´t perfect but at least it gets somewhere in the ballpark. Split the difference between your blitz and rapid ratings, and you´ve got 1600!
Jul 26, 2020
0
#126
RookSacrifice_OLD hat geschrieben:
AussieRookie wrote:
I don't think it is good enough FrostedBoy. Your Standard Rating is 1940 and your Blitz Rating is 840. What's going on there, FrostedBoy? The Mods should look into that.
Not funny
https://www.chess.com/games/archive/frostedboy?show=live_standard&gameType=live_standard&rated=rated
A 1100 ratings gap between blitz and rapid is ridiculous. If you look at his game history, you can see that he´s had lots of 1 move games against the same opponent that have boosted his ratings. Happens all the time. Usually these guys create multiple accounts, get a high rating and then play unrated games. For example: I played a "2400" in an unrated game and he got crushed. He played fine (no obvious blunders) but he created no threats and let me build a huge attack under no pressure (typical play for a decent 1200). I checked his account and, of course, saw lots of 1 move games against the same opponent. I contacted chess.com but they have decided not to act with this platinum subscriber.
Sep 15, 2020
0
#127
You guy are so good! I only have 918 and I'm ten and I've attended a year of chess school.
Sep 15, 2020
0
#128
I've been playing chess for one and a half years and I have 961 uSCF
Sep 15, 2020
0
#129
When I was 10 yrs, I wasn't even a beginner because I started in my teenage haha
Sep 16, 2020
0
#131
Wow I guess no-one reads the terms of service they have to agree too when joining here (or they lie).
Sep 25, 2020
0
#132
I can give no better advice than this: do not care about your age. I mean, Vishy Anand became GM at 18 which IS not young.He became WC. So basically just focus on your game. Anything might happen. luck is also there. I know this person who was 1900 elo at age 11. He studied chess very hard. He did not become GM or anything, but he became an NM and professional coach and is very successful. He worked on studies too!
BEEEGBRAIN wrote:
Holy guacamole! 1700???? thats a lot!
1700 nanometers isn’t that much.
I have no rating at all, I just play Jenga with the kids https://jenga-game.com/reviews/best-board-games-for-10-year-olds/. In general, this is a very good question, since it is boring to understand how to judge children.
Banana_69 wrote:
between 2500-2700 fide, anything lower is weak in this Bananas eyes
sir you've joined 8 days ago -_-
Oct 19, 2020
0
#138
camter wrote:
I think you are better than most 11 year olds by the sound of it.
But age of itself does not mean much after 7 or so. What an 11 year lacks is experience normally. How long you have been playing, your basic talent, and the time you spend in studying is the main thing.
Bobby Fischer was a fearsome player by age 12. But he was horribly unbalanced in character, and never really grew up.
Concentrate on the school work, and use Chess as a means of exercising your mind is my advice.
Wisdom from long ago.
Oct 19, 2020
0
#139
Roger436 wrote:
Banana_69 wrote:
between 2500-2700 fide, anything lower is weak in this Bananas eyes
sir you've joined 8 days ago -_-
That is because i was not a ripe Banana till 8 days ago.
I know since I'm eleven.