Chess.com Feature Request and Wishlist #4

Sort:
Avatar of artfizz
paul211 wrote:

(1) Spring cleaning is in order I think, I have already sent an e-mail to chess.com to ask for a clean up of my files, i.e, id est, that is, to remove all of the unused and unnecessary forums in my home page.


These history lists (or most recently used lists) are a feature common to most organising software these days. They generally perform a useful function. Some programs (e.g. browsers) do provide a function enabling the user to clear the entire list.

paul211 wrote:

(2) This includes: my tracked activities, my latest blog and my recent activities.


How is chess.com to know (in general) that you don't want these? I imagine that most people DO want these things; I find them useful as an aide memoire. Regarding My tracked activities: you can explicitly untrack these yourself.

paul211 wrote:

(3) This action will save millions if not billions of bytes in the storage system.


Clearing the lists won't save very much storage. Each list seems to be about 1KB of text. Even if 50,000 cleared their lists, that would only amount to 50MB. In practice, the majority won't clear their lists, either because they don't want to, or they won't get round to it.

paul211 wrote:

(4) The computer system might run faster, but my point is to get rid of unwanted forums, including my own.


There is a fundamental distinction between clearing the lists and clearing the forums. The lists are pointers to the forums. The lists don't take up much space. Removal of - or clearing - the list affects only the individual loooking at the lists.

Removal of the forums themselves has much more far-reaching effects - as I have already described previously.

paul211 wrote:

(5) When batgirl answered me that a clean up job is in process I thought it might be time for all of us to do the same.


No comment.

paul211 wrote:

(6) The site could provide a check box besides all of the items in the forums I mentionned above, similar to the message page:http://www.chess.com/home/messages.html,

where one can delete or deselect the unwanted items.


Since you have included a comma in the above reference, the link does not work. The tickbox selection provided for the deletion of messages is very effective. (Have you noticed the new New! indicator?) However, I consider it would be a mistake to encourage deletion of forums since this action affects all of the participants of those forums.

paul211 wrote:

(7) Alternatively a preset time limit can be set up, say 6 months, where beyond which a user would have the choice to retain old forums or delete.


We differ on the value of retaining forums 'for ever'. Storage is getting cheaper all the time. There is 'gold' to be mined from old forums - provided that adequately powerful search and indexing facilities are available.

paul211 wrote:

(8) And if no rsponse by the user they would be deleted with a reminder over a 3 day period that the action would be taken to remove all forums beyond a certain date.


And if the person happened to be on holiday or away for 4 days when this notice arrived, ALL of their investment in contributing to forums would be thrown away.

paul211 wrote:

(9) May sound a bit radical but regular maintenance, I would suggest twice a year is not asking for a lot. I used to do mine on a weekly basis.


There are different mindsets to managing information. I personally retain all emails that I have written or received since about 1975. I consider it a useful archive. When I write something, I expect it to persist. I write it in such a way that 25 years later, I anticipate it will still make sense.

paul211 wrote:

(10) Let's hear your suggestion all of you including chess.com people.


No further comment.

Avatar of artfizz

Baseballfan's topic on surveys and trophies Help make Chess.com even better! - Trophys and Surveys! seems to have been very effective in focussing suggestions for those two areas, while keeping the forum length manageable. One difficulty with the general wishlist discussions is that they cover everything (e.g. LiveChess, Forums, extensions to Tools, Interface improvements, New Features). Have you considered, for DeathWish 5, splitting it into a small number of separate topics?

Another simple option would be to lock the initial post containing the starting 30 or so items. Against each item, have a link to a topic (perhaps several items linked to the same follow-up topic). In that way, everyone can see the original list, but the details are developed in dedicated threads (including a NONE OF THE ABOVE list).

Avatar of erik
paul211 wrote:

Post #470 by artfizz.

I have reviewed your comments and concur that I should retain my forums( my recent activities).

As far as tracked activities I hold my position to be able to remove.

Some tracked activities are locked and I cannot remove.I rechecked and  there is no checkmark in the box to track the forum topic.

I agree with you that it would not be a good idea to have chess.com do a clean up of our files on a scheduled basis. It should be left to everyone to make their choice to retain infom or remove, provided the tools are set up to do so.


don't worry - we do all the optimizations for content, tracking, etc on our end. i appreciate your willingness, but we're OK! no need to delete anything :)

Avatar of malko

This is my request. I will flag it as low priority because it's not that important. In the settings page, in the board settings, there's not an example board with the pieces. If you want to know how the pieces look like, you have to select a piece style and open one of your games, then return to the settings.

Oh, and how about more pieces styles to select from? )As I said, it's low priority)  :)

Avatar of alexandrumag

I don't know if this has been mentioned before (I track this thread and have read all the posts but I can't remember), but I would find it nice to also have a longest undefeated streak included (that would mean wins or draws in a row). Nothing important, but the thought just popped in my head and I wanted to share it with you.

Keep up the good work erik & team,

Alex

Avatar of iUsuallyCastle

I really think that if there is only one legal move the opponent can make, it should just be moved by the computer, similar to a conditional move. This way, games in which there's an unavoidable checkmate wouldn't be drawn out by sore losers.

Avatar of Mm40
iUsuallyCastle wrote:

I really think that if there is only one legal move the opponent can make, it should just be moved by the computer, similar to a conditional move. This way, games in which there's an unavoidable checkmate wouldn't be drawn out by sore losers.


I second this. I often have a forced mate in, say, a 14 day per move game and just want to get it over with.

Avatar of artfizz
paul211 wrote: It would be amazing to be able to track posts from our friends. What are friends for?

What are Alert & Email Settings for?

paul211 wrote:

And it might be time to open a new forum organized by topics for suggestions.

Currently too many posts  on wishlist #4 nd only a super photographic memory person can recall all of the posts.

If chess.com needs suggestions as to the categories of posts to open and provide I am positiuve that the community can make suggestions.

Wishlist#4 is certainly diverse.


Avatar of TheGrobe

How about conditional moves for vote chess?  There'd be a need to expanded on the multiple lines functionality so that variations in the line could be introduced by the side you're playing for in addition to from your opponent (you'd just flag the one you prefer so that your vote would get cast for that move when the time came).

I'd also suggested in another thread the ability to set vote chess games up to have a moratorium after each of your opponent's move where voting was prohibited in order to encourage discussion before voting (probably simpler than, and possibly even a subset of, the nomination phase although both would be good).

Avatar of rwhcj225

Hi Erik,

Thanks for the great job you do.

Is there anyway to get the vote chess games I am  playing in to show up on my home page. That way I would not have to go to the vote chess area and search for my games. The list of current games is getting pretty long.

Thanks, Ray

Avatar of nmplayer

Id love to play online fischer random....

Avatar of kissinger

could we have the option of using webcams for online games, if both sides were willing to use them.  It would bring another dimension to the game...maybe it could be an option for a small fee/premium membership option.  Just wondering

Avatar of alexandrumag

two ideas:

a)how about an option in conditional moves to make a certain move, regardless of what the opponent plays? something like "if any,then Nxd5"

b) an option to hide your online status

Avatar of likesforests

paul211> where is the priotirizing list has it been published? ... I am the watch dog

Dear Mr. Watch Dog,
Did you not see Erik's post addressing exactly this point?
erik> i know, i know. i need to get to this. i'll get it done by March 1 :) until then, it won't matter as development is full-tilt on other projects.
He has twelve more days. Tongue out
Regards,
  likesforests
Avatar of erik

let's push that to march 15th... :)

Avatar of nerdie

15th it is. I'll be watchng too. hehe.

more power to you and your team erik.

 

after the 15th, may I have a game with you again erik?

just a thought.

you guys need break too.

Avatar of Spiffe

A request: In the Game Explorer, currently you can select Master Games, My Games, or Other Players Games (for one other player).  I think it would be fun to have an option to choose to see a collection of all Online games played here at chess.com.  Not a high-priority item, but it would be neat to see, for instance, how much more frequently Bird's Opening really gets played here than in the general populace.

Avatar of AlanL

A feature request:
A button on the analysis board that records the potential moves you've made into your private notes section for that game.  That way you can record a line of moves without committing to conditional moves.

Avatar of artfizz

GROUP SEARCH:

now that the Average Rating measure is displayed for every group (when you open the group to see the details), it would be very helpful if Average Rating could be added as a sort key - alongside the existing sort keys:  # of MembersDate Formed and Alphabetical.

This would make it easier to find groups with compatible strengths when setting up Team Match challenges. This should lead to fairer matches  (http://www.chess.com/forum/view/help-support/first-come-first-served-team-chess).

Avatar of drakesdman

How about multi sided team matches

2 teams join together to play against 1 or 2 teams vs. to other teams.

It would be great for the American World League teams

say they wasnted to do Northern America vs. Sout America they wouldn't have to Make 2 whole new teams to do so.

Same thing with east coast America vs West Coast America, or other teams if they just want to join together to defeat a stronger opponent. ( say team China and anti dream team against Dream team

This forum topic has been locked