Create a Promotional Chess.com Video and Win $1,000!!

Sort:
JohnnySpin

Wow! This is VERY COOL! Lezzzzz do it! :)

wannabe2700

I think it would be best to leave the judging to the staff. You know it is possible to buy views. And they do not cost that much.

wannabe2700

Hey btw is it allowed to make a sexy video and just show the chess.com logo here and there?

ROOKEMYO

heres my entry

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DRmz3YINv0

user2930482035

aw i cant wait i have a great idea :D

MyCowsCanFly
deadgunner wrote:

aw i cant wait i have a great idea :D


I can't wait to have a great idea.

Timotheous
MyCowsCanFly wrote:
deadgunner wrote:

aw i cant wait i have a great idea :D


I can't wait to have a great idea.


That's a great idea.

George1st

I have already won...don't even know what it's about yet.

: )))

keeeganomahoneey
erik wrote:
keeganomahoney wrote:
kohai wrote:

You video yourself.  Set the webcam or camera pointing at yourself, press record then do your thing :)


Oh ok thanks


but you don't have to. you could submit a blank screen. or a 3d graphic. or a video of your dog eating a chess piece. you can submit ANY kind of video (or more than one) that you want - just get the MOST views :)


I don't think that's a good idea, someone could just submit a really funny video that has nothing to do with chess or one that already has a load of likes.

nonowho

could we do this like every year?

Skinnymojo

Are animated entries discouraged?

erik
Skinnymojo wrote:

Are animated entries discouraged?


not at all! nothing is discouraged - just keep it family-friendly!

TD-I-Prevail

PLEASE CHANGE TO A DIFFERENT METHOD OF DECIDING THE WINNER! THIS COULD END UP WITH SOMEONE COMPLETELY UNDESERVING WINNING. ANYONE COULD EASILY SET UP A MACRO SO ADD VIEWS + LIKES. PLEASE, HAVE A PANNEL OF JUDGES OR SOMETHING, THIS CONTEST WILL TURN DIRTY AND WILL ULTIMATELY BE THE PERSON WHO BOOSTED THEIR VIEWS THE MOST! ALSO, PEOPLE WILL DISLIKE OTHER PEOPLE'S VIDEOS IN ORDER TO RAISE THEIR CHANCES OF WINNING! PLEASE, HAVE IT BE A STAFF JUDGED EVENT! OR A PLAYER JUDGED EVENT. (DO THIS ONCE PER IP ADDRESS OR ELSE PEOPLE WILL ONCE AGAIN BE INCLINED TO START MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS AND CHEAT!)

TD-I-Prevail

GREAT IDEA GUYS! YOU GUYS DON'T HAVE TO OFFER A PRIZE FOR THIS TYPE OF THING, LET THE TRUE FANS OF CHESS.COM HANDLE THIS AND TO PRODUCE THINGS SOLELY FOR IMPROVING THE PLAYERBASE. THIS WILL ULTIMATELY IMPROVE THE FINAL PRODUCT INTO SOMETHING AMAAAAAAZING!@#$!#$

George1st

I think the positivity is truly worthy of a grand applause.

Take my advice! Do not submit anything, you will only look foolish after seeing the by far winning entry by the one and only....George1st.

I hope this has helped.

: )))

George1st

In fact...! because we are only talking about a small amount of money....I will match the amount of 1,000 dollars in AUD. As long as I recieve 50% of the vote..making the grand prize..$2,000.

: )))

nonowho
George1st wrote:

In fact...! because we are only talking about a small amount of money....I will match the amount of 1,000 dollars in AUD. As long as I recieve 50% of the vote..making the grand prize..$2,000.

: )))


That's exactly how you get dislikes

nonowho

I'm a little bit confused as to how the "positive" youtube views work. you said you multiply the views by the percent of likes. what is the percent of likes?

George1st
nonowho wrote:
George1st wrote:

In fact...! because we are only talking about a small amount of money....I will match the amount of 1,000 dollars in AUD. As long as I recieve 50% of the vote..making the grand prize..$2,000.

: )))


That's exactly how you get dislikes


If offering more money to the winner is bad? Then should it be a contest where nobody wins anything? Is this a far better suggestion?

nonowho
George1st wrote:
nonowho wrote:
George1st wrote:

In fact...! because we are only talking about a small amount of money....I will match the amount of 1,000 dollars in AUD. As long as I recieve 50% of the vote..making the grand prize..$2,000.

: )))


That's exactly how you get dislikes


If offering more money to the winner is bad? Then should it be a contest where nobody wins anything? Is this a far better suggestion?


no the " as long as I get 50% of the vote" is how you get dislikes