kylexie wrote:
chesswhizz9 wrote:
How did you do that??? @kylexie
i said it was a joke
No as in how did you get all those blunders and misses
did chess.com add a "genius move"???😲😲
Sort:
Sep 29, 2023
0
#83
kylexie wrote:
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/90181933?tab=analysis&move=0
i got a lot of red briliant moves here <----this is a joke
are you kidding me, you got 0 accuracy
i did that on purpose im not that bad
I ain't falling for dat
Also the quality of the image is pretty low, so i should fairly say this is fake
Sep 29, 2023
0
#87
kylexie wrote:
i did that on purpose im not that bad
what I'm trying to say is in the accuracy boxes how 0.1 and danny rensch face???
Qinshu111_the_chess_panda wrote:
My guy you did not have to go through the trouble of proving this. We all knew already
I get em all the time… bruh 😎
I can’t be bothered to send any links today
This is all a lie. My chess is updated all the way, but it said excellent, not genius. Not even great, great job blud :scream :scream :scream :scream :scream :scream :scream :scream
Ain't genius just take the quee
n
Even if it was real, there is no way cc would have put that less editing into that, it's obviously fake.