ERIK!
to review-only because of how this thread has turned, and your interest in a new topic mentioned by rjc-https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/gift-from-chess-com?newCommentCount=3&page=1
- i asked why the chess board was suddenly smaller. jdcannon said it was due to new features. he never described them and vacated the topic.
- i started a tournament where i asked if there was a function to invite friends only. a staff member told me it was a great idea. when i asked if it would be implemented, no response.
- the topics/posts about limiting consecutive posting received no response from staff. it was put in place and then changed after what appeared to be significant pushback.
- the confusion about the red banner has never been addressed. even in this topic there are members making assumptions about what will trigger a mute. yet, no one knows. do you, erik?
- the integration of the 'bad' or 'poor' sport was never explained. how is it possible that a function such as this is put into place and questions on it are ignored?
- i, and others, were shut out of games with a banner that told us we haven't played enough, and, we are not allowed to challenge titled players. even a titled player got this!
- i sent in two tickets asking why i could not play live chess. i never received a response.
- the automutes have gotten out of hand. remember ghost of pushwood? he was muted at one time for writing 'b00bs'. he has had enough and gone to another site. no big deal except he is a titled player that could help many.
drspudnik put forth a good idea for dealing with a post instead of muting where all posts vanish. with all of the new stuff you do-achievements, flair, puzzle rush, i don't think it's far fetched that it could not be done. at the very least, you could respond if it is so.
in post #120 you wrote, "some fair criticisms".
then, in #131 you wrote, " I think the OP makes some great points. Communicating with our members is a challenge, and we can do better."
that was in october 2019.
in the link i cite you now seem to state i have an agenda. if i have one, it is to make the site better.
everyone allow that to sink in for a few moments. if you do not get it, please do not post.
it is obvious that he is ignoring you
"maybe you are the issue man". If Al can get Erik's ear, I'm all for having him represent the members' issues.