Old Thread: IMPORTANT Change Coming to Vacation Use!

Sort:
Cystem_Phailure
Kacparov wrote: Last few days? I've been reducing the number since June!

What's your target value?

Kacparov

around 400 I guess

ozzie_c_cobblepot

LegoPirateSenior I don't know I like the idea of the site being so friendly to players with MASSIVE numbers of games.

I once had 100+ games; I played moves at least once or twice a day. It became a chore, but thankfully it ended (reduced to <50 games) pretty quickly.

ilmago

okay, Kacper, in the last many days ... :-) I had been impressed when I saw that during the last couple of days, you managed to finish about 50 games per day or so :-)

Kacparov

at last I can be at home most of the day...but it will soon end :(

ozzie_c_cobblepot

What is your current games high water mark?

Kacparov

You mean the highest? Around 1300, but I don't know exactly because it was changing too quickly, too many people resigning and timting out...

ozzie_c_cobblepot

He's a deadbeat and has nothing better to do besides imitate Paul Keres. ;-)

kissinger

Great idea!   

LegoPirateSenior
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

LegoPirateSenior I don't know I like the idea of the site being so friendly to players with MASSIVE numbers of games.

I once had 100+ games; I played moves at least once or twice a day. It became a chore, but thankfully it ended (reduced to <50 games) pretty quickly.


Why don't you like the idea? Too easy to get addicted?

Smile

ozzie_c_cobblepot

I don't like the idea because I think that the site should be spending time on adding features useful for everybody, not features which are only useful for a small subset of users.

Kacparov

About 900 tournaments, 300 team matches, 100 friendly

LegoPirateSenior
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

I don't like the idea because I think that the site should be spending time on adding features useful for everybody, not features which are only useful for a small subset of users.


Good reason. I see your point.

artfizz
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote: I don't like the idea because I think that the site should be spending time on adding features useful for everybody, not features which are only useful for a small subset of users.

LegoPirateSenior wrote: Good reason. I see your point.


I imagine this proposed change will benefit virtually EVERYONE on the site:

1. the small group of members who get worked up about it

2. the slightly larger group who are not that bothered - but who nevertheless appreciate when childish behaviour (stalling) is curtailed

3. the even larger group who find 'vacation abuse' discussions/whining distasteful

4. the tiny group who either deliberately stall - or have an unsupportable number of games

Cystem_Phailure

It would be nice if group #3 ended up happy, but I suspect the amount of whining will not decrease but instead just shift focus.  Whiners can't help it-- if they don't whine about something their heads eventually explode and then someone has to clean up all that whine goo.

TheOldReb
Cystem_Phailure wrote:

It would be nice if group #3 ended up happy, but I suspect the amount of whining will not decrease but instead just shift focus.  Whiners can't help it-- if they don't whine about something their heads eventually explode and then someone has to clean up all that whine goo.


 Some people like to whine about whining.  Wink

goldendog

In a hands-across-the-water gesture, I whine about whinging.

kco

oh shut up you whingers Tongue out

Cystem_Phailure
Reb wrote:   Some people like to whine about whining. 

Cool For the most part I get a real kick out of reading the childish tantrums of the people who get so wrung out because others don't behave exactly as they demand.  If I didn't, I wouldn't read that type of thread!

golem3

Not a bad idea, but it does seem to punish people's short vacations! Perhaps user initiated vacations should be subject to the hourly rules.

This forum topic has been locked