Improved Computer Analysis

Sort:
Avatar of chessoholicalien

Nice! Does it give "verbose" analysis (á la Fritz), or just numerical evaluations?

Avatar of Candypants

I did an analysis were the computer didn´t see a backrank mate in one... Conclusion: if you are not a premium member, dont bother using it :)

Avatar of leightonnicholls

Sorry, But I really liked the old version better No bugs found in my analysis but the other 5 I am waiting on for around 2 days now? I really liked the older version!

Avatar of CoachConradAllison

The older version was weak.

Avatar of Kacparov

I'm waiting for 2 days too...

Avatar of erik

try resubmitting your game analysis!

Avatar of iFeather

I had a game sitting waiting for analysis for a few days. The game is no longer in my archive (free members don't get permanent storage i assume), but I can't analyze any other games as it says I am currently maxed out.

Avatar of zankfrappa

My analysis seems okay, although I'm not sure. 

Here's the problem.  I am rated 1907 while the person that beat me is rated a
2393.  The computer is rated a 2500.

I'm not trying to be humorous here, but how do I know if the analysis is accurate
or not.  If I knew that I wouldn't have made the errors in the first place.  So
when the computer tells me I made 6 inaccuracies how do I know if
that is correct or a bug?

Thanks.

Avatar of bondiggity
zankfrappa wrote:

My analysis seems okay, although I'm not sure. 

Here's the problem.  I am rated 1907 while the person that beat me is rated a
2393.  The computer is rated a 2500.

I'm not trying to be humorous here, but how do I know if the analysis is accurate
or not.  If I knew that I wouldn't have made the errors in the first place.  So
when the computer tells me I made 6 inaccuracies how do I know if
that is correct or a bug?

Thanks.


God forbid you analyze the game as well.....

Avatar of zankfrappa

That's not my point.  What I am saying is I don't really comprehend the games over 2000, so it is not whether I analyze them(which anyone can do, God forbid) but
whether I can grasp them.

Avatar of erik
zankfrappa wrote:

That's not my point.  What I am saying is I don't really comprehend the games over 2000, so it is not whether I analyze them(which anyone can do, God forbid) but
whether I can grasp them.


thanks frank. a bug wouldn't be in the subtelty of the analysis, it would be something obvious to you (like "white is better" when black is about to checkmate, or something)

Avatar of zankfrappa

erik,

Thanks.  I didn't know you meant something that obvious.  I was thinking along the lines of distinguishing between inaccuracies and so forth.

Avatar of Coach_Valentin

I look forward to seeing the new analysis in action. 

The old one at ~2200 level wasn't quite so useful for me personally, as it often saw less than I did in my analysis during the game, and frequently was outright wrong -- mostly because it evaluated the position strictly at the end of 6 moves, with no view forward on what might happen on, say, move 7 (where things might turn around 180 degrees).

Avatar of Kacparov
erik wrote:

try resubmitting your game analysis!


I tried to resublit it, but it said that I have already submitted this game and the analysis is processing.

Avatar of bondiggity

I submitted a bunch of games yesterday and they are still "processing". 

 

Is this a bug, or should >24 hours be expected with the backlog?

Avatar of ninevah

I think it was a bug - I have a game waiting for several days now.

Avatar of bondiggity

Ok I just got my 5 games through. I am currently going through the first one and something spotty happened. 

 

My opponent blundered into a mate in 5. After Ne5?? it evaluates at -Mate in 5, and gives the line for mate. Then after I miss the mate in 5, it says that the move I played was a blunder, I should have played Qc3 evaluated at 6.44. 

 

Something to this effect happened earlier too, however with the evaluation differences being less severe. 

Avatar of erik
bondiggity wrote:

Ok I just got my 5 games through. I am currently going through the first one and something spotty happened. 

 

My opponent blundered into a mate in 5. After Ne5?? it evaluates at -Mate in 5, and gives the line for mate. Then after I miss the mate in 5, it says that the move I played was a blunder, I should have played Qc3 evaluated at 6.44. 

 

Something to this effect happened earlier too, however with the evaluation differences being less severe. 


which game please?

Avatar of bondiggity

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game.html?id=8841665 , move 23. 

 

Also in this game analysis seems to have just stopped after the 16th move. 

Avatar of Kacparov

My game is now analysed as well, but there is another bug - I got checkmated, but it says "play might have continued"!