also the board themes are awfull, can barely concentrate on the pieces because of the loaded colors
awfull website
Worst site ever
Sort:
not to mention you have to pay for analyzing games. really ? nothing good to say
1600 elo is not called playing chess in your book ?
But the forum is nice and useful...oh, wait...
I mean, if u hate the site so much, why are u using it right now...
congrandolor u can try to improve you sense of humor, so others can understand it
AadarshIyengar for testing oppenings. its a burn account. but what do you know considering your elo
@lindarobert my USCF rating is waaay higher, sooo stop
And u can still use other platforms to test openings
Feb 12, 2020
0
#10
The OP dislikes this site so much that yesterday and today she's played a Grand total of 108 games.
Time to follow and laugh at the argument to come tie down your loved ones to protect from shouting
Feb 12, 2020
0
#14
lindarobert wrote:
1600 elo is not called playing chess in your book ?
I'm quite sure that he's not referring to your rating. You're playing bullet.
"Worst Site Ever!"
And yet, here you are
this actually also happens a lot with me and I hate this, my opponents wait for their clock to end and I lose my connection. And I don't think this is the worst website it's really good but chess.com has to fix this(aka when someone loses the connection let his time run like in chess kids, his opponent won't really be sad cause the clock can harm, and he will be able to calculate deeply into the position.
Feb 12, 2020
0
#17
lindarobert schreef:
1600 elo is not called playing chess in your book ?
And which 1600 elo is that? Are you refering to your chess.com online blitz rating? If you want to boast about ratings, get an actual "over the board" rating. Online ratings (even though they might look cool) don't hold any value.
Spelenderwijs wrote:
lindarobert schreef:
1600 elo is not called playing chess in your book ?
And which 1600 elo is that? Are you refering to your chess.com online blitz rating? If you want to boast about ratings, get an actual "over the board" rating. Online ratings (even though they might look cool) don't hold any value.
im too old to be accepted into a local chess club, for playing otb tournaments
Feb 12, 2020
0
#19
lindarobert wrote:
Spelenderwijs wrote:
lindarobert schreef:
1600 elo is not called playing chess in your book ?
And which 1600 elo is that? Are you refering to your chess.com online blitz rating? If you want to boast about ratings, get an actual "over the board" rating. Online ratings (even though they might look cool) don't hold any value.
im too old to be accepted into a local chess club, for playing otb tournaments
What does age have to do with it?
lindarobert wrote:
Spelenderwijs wrote:
lindarobert schreef:
1600 elo is not called playing chess in your book ?
And which 1600 elo is that? Are you refering to your chess.com online blitz rating? If you want to boast about ratings, get an actual "over the board" rating. Online ratings (even though they might look cool) don't hold any value.
im too old to be accepted into a local chess club, for playing otb tournaments
The age cutoff for tournaments is 12, so you should be allowed in just fine.
Ilost today 2 games because of server being down. Not to mention i've lost a lot of games because the pieces on the board moved slowly, which ended up with me taking longer time to respond to the opponent moves.
Worst website for bullet ever.
[another site -- VP] is the best