Pawnvenom wrote:
I am playing white and, had my opponent not resigned, I would play Rf8 ... easy right. The "short" analysis agrees with this (see image). Why can't the deep analysis see this? It gives the best line, with an inferior score (depth 33!!!!) as exchanging queens (36. Qf8) rather than winning a queen for a rook .. I am really confused by this. Different but in the same game, the review rated a move I played as losing my queen ... but it only loses a bishop for a pawn. What is going on with this engine?!
In the analysis, move 34 is Qxg5, followed by Qf4+ and finally Qf8. Apparently the engine like the extra pawn more than immediately winning the queen.
I am playing white and, had my opponent not resigned, I would play Rf8 ... easy right. The "short" analysis agrees with this (see image). Why can't the deep analysis see this?? It gives the best line, with an inferior score (depth 33!!!!) as exchanging queens (36. Qf8) rather than winning a queen for a rook .. I am really confused by this. Different but in the same game, the review rated a move I played as losing my queen ... but it only loses a bishop for a pawn. What is going on with this engine?!