I've had two that I knew of.. one a rook sac that didn't gain any material; rather, the engine suggested it was the only move that didn't lose any, and the other a simple capture of a bishop where I had a trapped rook I could've attacked instead.
I'm an utter beginner and love to look at the post game analysis to try and learn something. I was SHOCKED when I found out I had actually made a "brilliant" move. I was even more SHOCKED to find that I actually made two "brilliant" moves in the same game!!! I was very disappointed to lose that game too. All it takes is one blunder... Those were the only "brilliant" moves I have made and I still don't understand why they were considered brilliant. I think I need a good coach.
Then why aren't you listening? The "brilliant move" assessment is hype. Doesn't mean any more than "good move".
Seems some people aren't brilliant at reading. 
apparently, this is a brilliant move?
I had 2 in this game. It seems a lot of brilliant moves are sacrifices.
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/354561887?tab=review
a normal threatened king and rook fork. how is this a brilliant move? (I think the reason is because it's a counter attack.)
That wasn’t really brilliant worthy, but that was a really nice deflection tactic
I once got 2 brilliant moves in the same game, they really don't mean anything though since i only got them for some pretty simple moves
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/35738172859?tab=review
i played 3 brilnet moves
before
i played 2 brilliant moves in the same game. the other one was in one game
What is the most brillant moves in one game in the Chess.com database?
its when computer is also not able to guess that idea