henrymathnerd wrote:
@bald55 I just can't find M1 anywhere
🧠🧠🧠🧠🧠
If you find mate in 1, you’re a genius 🧠
Sort:
Nov 16, 2023
0
#143
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
chesswhizz9 wrote:
Qb3#
the queen is pinned because of the bishop
So what? It's still checkmate.
No, because then the bishop will be checking the king, which is an illegal move.
Time to read the game rules for the first time.
Following your silly claim, this is not a checkmate either (as well as countless other positions) because the Queen is pinned.
That is not the same type of position…
In the actual puzzle moving the queen to any direction but diagonally puts your king in check. Moving your queen there, however, doesn’t. Please have a brain before posting.
Nov 16, 2023
0
#144
nathan1600elo wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
Ez.Qc7
Wrong, it's Qb3#. Why don't you analyze the position before you come up with a solution? And not with analysis, either. With your brain.
How old are you?
I'm 1937 USCF
1679 rapid on my main account.
And the 5th best 13 year old in the world.
obv even with those ratings you wouldn't even be close to 5th best 13 y/o but even if i assumed that was your actual rating how is you uscf so much higher than you chess.com lmao
Nov 16, 2023
0
#145
tedpower2 wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
Ez.Qc7
Wrong, it's Qb3#. Why don't you analyze the position before you come up with a solution? And not with analysis, either. With your brain.
How old are you?
I'm 1937 USCF
1679 rapid on my main account.
And the 5th best 13 year old in the world.
obv even with those ratings you wouldn't even be close to 5th best 13 y/o but even if i assumed that was your actual rating how is you uscf so much higher than you chess.com lmao
I managed to actually beat him once.
The next gam, we drew. Game Review rated me 1900, him 1950. But only because I accidentally blundered my knight one move.
Nov 16, 2023
0
#146
AbyssalSludge wrote:
tedpower2 wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
Ez.Qc7
Wrong, it's Qb3#. Why don't you analyze the position before you come up with a solution? And not with analysis, either. With your brain.
How old are you?
I'm 1937 USCF
1679 rapid on my main account.
And the 5th best 13 year old in the world.
obv even with those ratings you wouldn't even be close to 5th best 13 y/o but even if i assumed that was your actual rating how is you uscf so much higher than you chess.com lmao
I managed to actually beat him once.
The next gam, we drew. Game Review rated me 1900, him 1950. But only because I accidentally blundered my knight one move.
i mean he is a 1400 ofc you can beat him
Nov 16, 2023
0
#147
tedpower2 wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
tedpower2 wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
Ez.Qc7
Wrong, it's Qb3#. Why don't you analyze the position before you come up with a solution? And not with analysis, either. With your brain.
How old are you?
I'm 1937 USCF
1679 rapid on my main account.
And the 5th best 13 year old in the world.
obv even with those ratings you wouldn't even be close to 5th best 13 y/o but even if i assumed that was your actual rating how is you uscf so much higher than you chess.com lmao
I managed to actually beat him once.
The next gam, we drew. Game Review rated me 1900, him 1950. But only because I accidentally blundered my knight one move.
i mean he is a 1400 ofc you can beat him
He’s 1600
Nov 16, 2023
0
#148
AbyssalSludge wrote:
tedpower2 wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
tedpower2 wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
Ez.Qc7
Wrong, it's Qb3#. Why don't you analyze the position before you come up with a solution? And not with analysis, either. With your brain.
How old are you?
I'm 1937 USCF
1679 rapid on my main account.
And the 5th best 13 year old in the world.
obv even with those ratings you wouldn't even be close to 5th best 13 y/o but even if i assumed that was your actual rating how is you uscf so much higher than you chess.com lmao
I managed to actually beat him once.
The next gam, we drew. Game Review rated me 1900, him 1950. But only because I accidentally blundered my knight one move.
i mean he is a 1400 ofc you can beat him
He’s 1600
basically the same
Nov 16, 2023
0
#149
tedpower2 wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
tedpower2 wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
tedpower2 wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
AbyssalSludge wrote:
nathan1600elo wrote:
Ez.Qc7
Wrong, it's Qb3#. Why don't you analyze the position before you come up with a solution? And not with analysis, either. With your brain.
How old are you?
I'm 1937 USCF
1679 rapid on my main account.
And the 5th best 13 year old in the world.
obv even with those ratings you wouldn't even be close to 5th best 13 y/o but even if i assumed that was your actual rating how is you uscf so much higher than you chess.com lmao
I managed to actually beat him once.
The next gam, we drew. Game Review rated me 1900, him 1950. But only because I accidentally blundered my knight one move.
i mean he is a 1400 ofc you can beat him
He’s 1600
basically the same
My point is that I played like a 1900. That’s amazing.
It's Qc7#
Nov 16, 2023
0
#151
Ilikenitrotypeandblooket wrote:
It's Qc7#
Queen is pinned by the bishop, please verify you are correct before posting…
Ra6#
simple
Qc7# 
Nov 17, 2023
0
#156
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
chesswhizz9 wrote:
Qb3#
the queen is pinned because of the bishop
So what? It's still checkmate.
No, because then the bishop will be checking the king, which is an illegal move.
Time to read the game rules for the first time.
Following your silly claim, this is not a checkmate either (as well as countless other positions) because the Queen is pinned.
No, that's not a checkmate because the bishop can take the queen. It doesn't matter if the queen is pinned or not. YOU should read the rules.
https://support.chess.com/article/373-checkmate-with-a-pinned-piece-whats-going-on
Nov 17, 2023
0
#158
KieferSmith wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
chesswhizz9 wrote:
Qb3#
the queen is pinned because of the bishop
So what? It's still checkmate.
No, because then the bishop will be checking the king, which is an illegal move.
Time to read the game rules for the first time.
Following your silly claim, this is not a checkmate either (as well as countless other positions) because the Queen is pinned.
No, that's not a checkmate because the bishop can take the queen. It doesn't matter if the queen is pinned or not. YOU should read the rules.
https://support.chess.com/article/373-checkmate-with-a-pinned-piece-whats-going-on
No, the bishop is pinned by the rook
But still, it's not the same scenario
KieferSmith wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
GabyNguyen wrote:
chesswhizz9 wrote:
Qb3#
the queen is pinned because of the bishop
So what? It's still checkmate.
No, because then the bishop will be checking the king, which is an illegal move.
Time to read the game rules for the first time.
Following your silly claim, this is not a checkmate either (as well as countless other positions) because the Queen is pinned.
No, that's not a checkmate because the bishop can take the queen. It doesn't matter if the queen is pinned or not. YOU should read the rules.
https://support.chess.com/article/373-checkmate-with-a-pinned-piece-whats-going-on
Clown
@bald55 I just can't find M1 anywhere