I got 100.0 Accuracy in Opening Section twice(idk about my other games)
Check Here
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/94219998661?tab=review
https://www.chess.com/game/live/94011673113 (idk if this is one)
77% and 88.3% are far from 100%
That's awesome! I have gotten 100.0 to and I was like what the heck because I have never done that so I was really proud of myself and I think you are just as proud that you got 100.0 because its hard to do that but its possible because when your focused you are in the zone and know that their queen is vulnerable and you take it. So good job.
I typed too much.
The algorithm evaluates positions and depth of play, but it has its preferences. And those are the brilliant moves and the great moves.
They highly value capturing an isolated piece and traps.
They also value sacrifices excessively.
The "smoothered mate", in particular, gives it the category of "brilliant".
A rating of 100 is possible, but apart from book moves there must be great and brilliant moves. And Luck!
Yep.
I got 100.0 Accuracy in Opening Section twice(idk about my other games)
Check Here
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/94219998661?tab=review
https://www.chess.com/game/live/94011673113 (idk if this is one)
77% and 88.3% are far from 100%
i meant for opening
Yes because there are a lot of cheaters here and reporting is a joke.
We don't say the c-word here!
It attracts unwanted attention. Like saying "Beetlejuice" three times.
beetlejuice beetlejuice beetlejuice
I am not clear why some people are suggesting that it is only 'all book moves'. There are plenty of games showcased here where players have got a 100% accuracy. Looking through these there are some patterns; No really long games, one player tends to make a bad move or series of bad moves that the opponent efficiently capitalizes on. The thread is " is it possible?" answer yes, and not just by super high rated players, it depends on the mistakes and how well they are seized upon.
They're either extremely ignorant or they're trolling. They'll spam 'No' despite there being examples given directly above their response.
Here I played with 100% accuracy for reals 
Check out this #chess game: skumhar2263 vs roymusonda - https://www.chess.com/live/game/94479192537
Pehaps it's a chess.com bug but i have 100% ... and opponent who looses, too! ^^
In this game Black got 100% accuracy.
99.7
Yes.
100% accuracy is actually trash, because the way percentages work 100% = 1. Since the accuracy scores on chess.com are not percentages, the highest accuracy score possible is 100, or 10,000%.
100% accuracy is actually trash, because the way percentages work 100% = 1. Since the accuracy scores on chess.com are not percentages, the highest accuracy score possible is 100, or 10,000%.
The percent is implied.
if you were a math nerd like myself you would understand why it's so important. If there's no percent icon, then it's not a percent. It's as simple as that.
I got 100.0 Accuracy in Opening Section twice(idk about my other games)
Check Here
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/94219998661?tab=review
https://www.chess.com/game/live/94011673113 (idk if this is one)